Nuprl Lemma : int-prod-isolate

∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[m:ℕn]. ∀[f:ℕn ⟶ ℤ].  (Π(f[x] | x < n) = (Π(if (x =z m) then 1 else f[x] fi  | x < n) * f[m]) ∈ ℤ)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  int-prod: Π(f[x] | x < k),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  eq_int: (i =z j),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  multiply: n * m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  assert: ↑b,  bnot: ¬bb,  bfalse: ff,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  it: ⋅,  unit: Unit,  bool: 𝔹,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  le: A ≤ B,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  guard: {T},  sq_type: SQType(T),  prop: ℙ,  top: Top,  false: False,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  uimplies: b supposing a,  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  ge: i ≥ j ,  nat: ℕ,  and: P ∧ Q,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  int_seg: {i..j-},  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  true: True,  squash: ↓T,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T 
Lemmas referenced :  nat_wf,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  assert-bnot,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_cases_sqequal,  equal_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  bool_wf,  false_wf,  add-member-int_seg1,  le_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  itermSubtract_wf,  intformle_wf,  decidable__le,  int_seg_properties,  subtract_wf,  int_seg_wf,  eq_int_wf,  ifthenelse_wf,  int_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  lelt_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformand_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  decidable__lt,  nat_properties,  int-prod-split,  iff_weakening_equal,  btrue_wf,  eq_int_eq_true,  true_wf,  squash_wf,  zero-add,  int-prod-single,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  int-prod_wf,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  itermMultiply_wf,  decidable__equal_int
Rules used in proof :  axiomEquality,  functionEquality,  promote_hyp,  equalityElimination,  lambdaFormation,  functionExtensionality,  applyEquality,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  because_Cache,  sqequalRule,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  independent_functionElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_isectElimination,  unionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  addEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  hypothesis,  independent_pairFormation,  productElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  rename,  setElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  thin,  isectElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  cut,  introduction,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution,  baseClosed,  imageMemberEquality,  universeEquality,  imageElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[m:\mBbbN{}n].  \mforall{}[f:\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbZ{}].
    (\mPi{}(f[x]  |  x  <  n)  =  (\mPi{}(if  (x  =\msubz{}  m)  then  1  else  f[x]  fi    |  x  <  n)  *  f[m]))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-00_29_36
Last ObjectModification: 2017_12_10-PM-11_43_03

Theory : int_2


Home Index