Nuprl Lemma : bag-count-remove1

∀[T:Type]
  ∀eq:EqDecider(T). ∀x:T. ∀bs:bag(T).
    ((x ↓∈ bs ∧ ((#x in outl(bag-remove1(eq;bs;x))) = ((#x in bs) - 1) ∈ ℕ)) ∨ (¬x ↓∈ bs))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bag-remove1: bag-remove1(eq;bs;a),  bag-count: (#x in bs),  bag-member: x ↓∈ bs,  bag: bag(T),  deq: EqDecider(T),  nat: ℕ,  outl: outl(x),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  or: P ∨ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  subtract: n - m,  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  cand: A c∧ B,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  false: False,  prop: ℙ,  guard: {T},  uimplies: b supposing a,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  sq_type: SQType(T),  true: True,  nat: ℕ,  single-bag: {x},  deq: EqDecider(T),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  eqof: eqof(d),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  bfalse: ff,  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  squash: ↓T,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  isl: isl(x),  outl: outl(x)
Lemmas referenced :  decidable__bag-member,  decidable-equal-deq,  bag-remove1-property,  not_wf,  bag-member_wf,  equal_wf,  nat_wf,  bag-count_wf,  bag_wf,  deq_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  subtract_wf,  single-bag_wf,  cons_wf,  nil_wf,  list-subtype-bag,  ifthenelse_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  safe-assert-deq,  decidable__equal_int,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  bag-count-append,  iff_weakening_equal,  add_functionality_wrt_eq,  bag-count-single,  outl_wf,  assert_wf,  isl_wf,  unit_wf2,  and_wf,  btrue_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  hypothesis,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  inlFormation,  independent_pairFormation,  because_Cache,  productElimination,  voidElimination,  cumulativity,  sqequalRule,  inrFormation,  productEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  universeEquality,  instantiate,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  applyEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  lambdaEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  equalityElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  promote_hyp,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  unionEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]
    \mforall{}eq:EqDecider(T).  \mforall{}x:T.  \mforall{}bs:bag(T).
        ((x  \mdownarrow{}\mmember{}  bs  \mwedge{}  ((\#x  in  outl(bag-remove1(eq;bs;x)))  =  ((\#x  in  bs)  -  1)))  \mvee{}  (\mneg{}x  \mdownarrow{}\mmember{}  bs))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_48_21
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_30_37

Theory : bags_2


Home Index