Nuprl Lemma : bag-count-rep

∀[T:Type]. ∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(T)]. ∀[x,y:T].  ((#x in bag-rep(n;y)) = if eq x y then n else 0 fi  ∈ ℤ)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bag-count: (#x in bs),  bag-rep: bag-rep(n;x),  deq: EqDecider(T),  nat: ℕ,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  apply: f a,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  bag-rep: bag-rep(n;x),  eq_int: (i =z j),  subtract: n - m,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  deq: EqDecider(T),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  eqof: eqof(d),  bfalse: ff,  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  decidable: Dec(P),  cons-bag: x.b,  bag-count: (#x in bs),  count: count(P;L),  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  true: True,  squash: ↓T,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  deq_wf,  primrec-unroll,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  safe-assert-deq,  bag-count-empty,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  decidable__le,  subtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  eq_int_wf,  assert_of_eq_int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  reduce_cons_lemma,  nat_wf,  ifthenelse_wf,  bag-count_wf,  bag-rep_wf,  le_wf,  list-subtype-bag,  decidable__equal_int,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  add_functionality_wrt_eq,  iff_weakening_equal
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  lambdaFormation,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  axiomEquality,  cumulativity,  applyEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  because_Cache,  productElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  universeEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(T)].  \mforall{}[x,y:T].
    ((\#x  in  bag-rep(n;y))  =  if  eq  x  y  then  n  else  0  fi  )



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_46_12
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_29_57

Theory : bags_2


Home Index