Nuprl Lemma : bag-count-rep
∀[T:Type]. ∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(T)]. ∀[x,y:T].  ((#x in bag-rep(n;y)) = if eq x y then n else 0 fi  ∈ ℤ)
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
bag-count: (#x in bs), 
bag-rep: bag-rep(n;x), 
deq: EqDecider(T), 
nat: ℕ, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi , 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x], 
apply: f a, 
natural_number: $n, 
int: ℤ, 
universe: Type, 
equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x], 
member: t ∈ T, 
nat: ℕ, 
implies: P ⇒ Q, 
false: False, 
ge: i ≥ j , 
uimplies: b supposing a, 
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla), 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x], 
not: ¬A, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x], 
top: Top, 
and: P ∧ Q, 
prop: ℙ, 
bag-rep: bag-rep(n;x), 
eq_int: (i =z j), 
subtract: n - m, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi , 
btrue: tt, 
deq: EqDecider(T), 
bool: 𝔹, 
unit: Unit, 
it: ⋅, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q), 
eqof: eqof(d), 
bfalse: ff, 
or: P ∨ Q, 
sq_type: SQType(T), 
guard: {T}, 
bnot: ¬bb, 
assert: ↑b, 
decidable: Dec(P), 
cons-bag: x.b, 
bag-count: (#x in bs), 
count: count(P;L), 
nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T , 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B, 
true: True, 
squash: ↓T, 
iff: P ⇐⇒ Q, 
rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced : 
nat_properties, 
satisfiable-full-omega-tt, 
intformand_wf, 
intformle_wf, 
itermConstant_wf, 
itermVar_wf, 
intformless_wf, 
int_formula_prop_and_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_le_lemma, 
int_term_value_constant_lemma, 
int_term_value_var_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_less_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_wf, 
ge_wf, 
less_than_wf, 
deq_wf, 
primrec-unroll, 
bool_wf, 
eqtt_to_assert, 
safe-assert-deq, 
bag-count-empty, 
eqff_to_assert, 
equal_wf, 
bool_cases_sqequal, 
subtype_base_sq, 
bool_subtype_base, 
assert-bnot, 
decidable__le, 
subtract_wf, 
intformnot_wf, 
itermSubtract_wf, 
int_formula_prop_not_lemma, 
int_term_value_subtract_lemma, 
eq_int_wf, 
assert_of_eq_int, 
intformeq_wf, 
int_formula_prop_eq_lemma, 
neg_assert_of_eq_int, 
reduce_cons_lemma, 
nat_wf, 
ifthenelse_wf, 
bag-count_wf, 
bag-rep_wf, 
le_wf, 
list-subtype-bag, 
decidable__equal_int, 
itermAdd_wf, 
int_term_value_add_lemma, 
squash_wf, 
true_wf, 
add_functionality_wrt_eq, 
iff_weakening_equal
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
isect_memberFormation, 
introduction, 
cut, 
extract_by_obid, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
isectElimination, 
thin, 
hypothesisEquality, 
hypothesis, 
setElimination, 
rename, 
intWeakElimination, 
lambdaFormation, 
natural_numberEquality, 
independent_isectElimination, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
lambdaEquality, 
int_eqEquality, 
intEquality, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
isect_memberEquality, 
voidElimination, 
voidEquality, 
sqequalRule, 
independent_pairFormation, 
computeAll, 
independent_functionElimination, 
axiomEquality, 
cumulativity, 
applyEquality, 
unionElimination, 
equalityElimination, 
because_Cache, 
productElimination, 
equalityTransitivity, 
equalitySymmetry, 
promote_hyp, 
instantiate, 
universeEquality, 
dependent_set_memberEquality, 
imageElimination, 
imageMemberEquality, 
baseClosed
Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(T)].  \mforall{}[x,y:T].
    ((\#x  in  bag-rep(n;y))  =  if  eq  x  y  then  n  else  0  fi  )
Date html generated:
2018_05_21-PM-09_46_12
Last ObjectModification:
2017_07_26-PM-06_29_57
Theory : bags_2
Home
Index