Nuprl Lemma : det-fun-row-op

∀[r:Rng]. ∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[d:det-fun(r;n)]. ∀[M:Matrix(n;n;r)]. ∀[a,b:ℕn]. ∀[k:|r|].
  (d row-op(r;a;b;k;M)) = (d M) ∈ |r| supposing ¬(a = b ∈ ℤ)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  row-op: row-op(r;a;b;k;M),  det-fun: det-fun(r;n),  matrix: Matrix(n;m;r),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  not: ¬A,  apply: f a,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T,  rng: Rng,  rng_car: |r|
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  det-fun: det-fun(r;n),  and: P ∧ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  infix_ap: x f y,  rng: Rng,  nat: ℕ,  prop: ℙ,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  int_seg: {i..j-},  matrix: Matrix(n;m;r),  matrix-ap: M[i,j],  mx: matrix(M[x; y]),  row-op: row-op(r;a;b;k;M),  false: False,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  matrix-mul-row: matrix-mul-row(r;k;i;M),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  matrix-swap-rows: matrix-swap-rows(M;i;j),  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  decidable: Dec(P),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  rng_times_wf,  matrix-ap_wf,  int_seg_wf,  equal_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  rng_car_wf,  not_wf,  matrix_wf,  det-fun_wf,  nat_wf,  rng_wf,  rng_plus_comm,  mx_wf,  rng_plus_wf,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  rng_sig_wf,  int_seg_properties,  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  equal-wf-base,  int_subtype_base,  decidable__le,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  decidable__lt,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  lelt_wf,  rng_zero_wf,  rng_times_zero,  subtype_rel_self,  rng_plus_zero,  iff_weakening_equal
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  setElimination,  thin,  rename,  productElimination,  hypothesis,  dependent_functionElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  lambdaEquality,  applyEquality,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  because_Cache,  natural_numberEquality,  sqequalRule,  hyp_replacement,  equalitySymmetry,  imageElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  axiomEquality,  functionExtensionality,  int_eqEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  lambdaFormation,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  int_eqReduceTrueSq,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  int_eqReduceFalseSq,  functionEquality,  approximateComputation,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[r:Rng].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[d:det-fun(r;n)].  \mforall{}[M:Matrix(n;n;r)].  \mforall{}[a,b:\mBbbN{}n].  \mforall{}[k:|r|].
    (d  row-op(r;a;b;k;M))  =  (d  M)  supposing  \mneg{}(a  =  b)



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_37_01
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_19-PM-04_28_42

Theory : matrices


Home Index