Nuprl Lemma : det-multiple-row-ops

∀[r:CRng]. ∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[M:Matrix(n;n;r)]. ∀[a:ℕn]. ∀[k:|r|].
  (|matrix(if x=a then M[x,y] else (M[x,y] +r (k * M[a,y])))| = |M| ∈ |r|)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  matrix-det: |M|,  mx: matrix(M[x; y]),  matrix-ap: M[i,j],  matrix: Matrix(n;m;r),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  infix_ap: x f y,  int_eq: if a=b then c else d,  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T,  crng: CRng,  rng_times: *,  rng_plus: +r,  rng_car: |r|
Definitions unfolded in proof :  nat: ℕ,  rng: Rng,  crng: CRng,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  prop: ℙ,  and: P ∧ Q,  top: Top,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  not: ¬A,  uimplies: b supposing a,  ge: i ≥ j ,  false: False,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  true: True,  assert: ↑b,  bnot: ¬bb,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bfalse: ff,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  guard: {T},  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  btrue: tt,  it: ⋅,  unit: Unit,  bool: 𝔹,  int_seg: {i..j-},  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  matrix-ap: M[i,j],  matrix: Matrix(n;m;r),  squash: ↓T,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  row-op: row-op(r;a;b;k;M)
Lemmas referenced :  crng_wf,  nat_wf,  matrix_wf,  int_seg_wf,  rng_car_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  itermSubtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  subtract_wf,  decidable__le,  less_than_wf,  ge_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformand_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  nat_properties,  matrix-ap_wf,  assert-bnot,  bool_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_cases_sqequal,  equal_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  int_seg_properties,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  bool_wf,  lt_int_wf,  matrix_ap_mx_lemma,  rng_wf,  true_wf,  squash_wf,  matrix-det_wf,  decidable__lt,  decidable__equal_int,  rng_times_wf,  rng_plus_wf,  infix_ap_wf,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  assert_of_eq_int,  eq_int_wf,  rng_sig_wf,  mx_wf,  lelt_wf,  det-row-op
Rules used in proof :  natural_numberEquality,  because_Cache,  axiomEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  sqequalRule,  hypothesisEquality,  rename,  setElimination,  thin,  isectElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  hypothesis,  cut,  introduction,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution,  unionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  independent_functionElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_isectElimination,  intWeakElimination,  lambdaFormation,  baseClosed,  imageMemberEquality,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  promote_hyp,  productElimination,  equalityElimination,  functionExtensionality,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  imageElimination,  applyEquality,  int_eqReduceFalseSq,  int_eqReduceTrueSq,  functionEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[r:CRng].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[M:Matrix(n;n;r)].  \mforall{}[a:\mBbbN{}n].  \mforall{}[k:|r|].
    (|matrix(if  x=a  then  M[x,y]  else  (M[x,y]  +r  (k  *  M[a,y])))|  =  |M|)



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_37_11
Last ObjectModification: 2018_01_02-PM-03_59_43

Theory : matrices


Home Index