Nuprl Lemma : q-linear-equal

∀[k:ℕ]. ∀[X:ℕ ⟶ ℚ]. ∀[y,z:ℚ List].
  (q-linear(k;j.X[j];y) = q-linear(k;j.X[j];z) ∈ ℚ) supposing 
     ((∀i:ℕk. (y[i] = z[i] ∈ ℚ)) and 
     (k ≤ ||z||) and 
     (k ≤ ||y||))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  q-linear: q-linear(k;i.X[i];y),  rationals: ℚ,  select: L[n],  length: ||as||,  list: T List,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  le: A ≤ B,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  guard: {T},  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  le: A ≤ B,  so_apply: x[s],  true: True,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  squash: ↓T,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  less_than: a < b,  nat_plus: ℕ+
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  int_seg_wf,  int_seg_properties,  le_wf,  length_wf,  rationals_wf,  list_wf,  nat_wf,  subtract-1-ge-0,  select_wf,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  decidable__lt,  decidable__equal_int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  istype-false,  equal_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  istype-universe,  q-linear-base,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  qmul_wf,  lelt_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  itermSubtract_wf,  subtract_wf,  qadd_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  all_wf,  q-linear-unroll
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  lambdaFormation_alt,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  lambdaEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  universeIsType,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  inhabitedIsType,  functionIsTypeImplies,  functionIsType,  productElimination,  equalityIsType1,  because_Cache,  unionElimination,  applyEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  instantiate,  lambdaFormation,  functionExtensionality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  functionEquality,  computeAll,  voidEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  isect_memberFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}[k:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[X:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbQ{}].  \mforall{}[y,z:\mBbbQ{}  List].
    (q-linear(k;j.X[j];y)  =  q-linear(k;j.X[j];z))  supposing 
          ((\mforall{}i:\mBbbN{}k.  (y[i]  =  z[i]))  and 
          (k  \mleq{}  ||z||)  and 
          (k  \mleq{}  ||y||))



Date html generated: 2019_10_16-PM-00_33_23
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_10-AM-11_05_23

Theory : rationals


Home Index