Nuprl Lemma : qinv_wf

∀[r:ℚ]. 1/r ∈ ℚ supposing ¬↑qeq(r;0)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  qinv: 1/r,  rationals: ℚ,  qeq: qeq(r;s),  assert: ↑b,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  not: ¬A,  member: t ∈ T,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  rationals: ℚ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  quotient: x,y:A//B[x; y],  and: P ∧ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  squash: ↓T,  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  sq_type: SQType(T),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  guard: {T},  true: True,  b-union: A ⋃ B,  tunion: ⋃x:A.B[x],  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  pi2: snd(t),  not: ¬A,  false: False,  qeq: qeq(r;s),  callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall,  evalall: evalall(t),  btrue: tt,  qinv: 1/r,  has-value: (a)↓,  has-valueall: has-valueall(a),  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  bfalse: ff,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top
Lemmas referenced :  rationals_wf,  b-union_wf,  int_nzero_wf,  bool_wf,  qeq_wf,  qeq_refl,  qeq-functionality,  subtype_rel_b-union-left,  member_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  istype-universe,  quotient-member-eq,  qeq-equiv,  qinv-wf,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  equal-wf-T-base,  assert_wf,  istype-void,  valueall-type-has-valueall,  int-valueall-type,  evalall-reduce,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  int_subtype_base,  product-valueall-type,  eq_int_wf,  set-valueall-type,  nequal_wf,  int_nzero_properties,  decidable__equal_int,  full-omega-unsat,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  intformand_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  equal_wf,  not_wf,  int-subtype-rationals,  qeq-wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalRule,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  hypothesis,  equalitySymmetry,  universeIsType,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  thin,  intEquality,  productEquality,  promote_hyp,  lambdaFormation_alt,  equalityIsType3,  hypothesisEquality,  baseClosed,  inhabitedIsType,  pointwiseFunctionality,  pertypeElimination,  productElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  applyEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  productIsType,  equalityIsType4,  dependent_functionElimination,  lambdaEquality_alt,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  because_Cache,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  functionIsType,  equalityIsType1,  callbyvalueReduce,  sqleReflexivity,  isintReduceTrue,  independent_pairEquality,  multiplyEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  lambdaFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}[r:\mBbbQ{}].  1/r  \mmember{}  \mBbbQ{}  supposing  \mneg{}\muparrow{}qeq(r;0)



Date html generated: 2019_10_16-AM-11_47_12
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_11-PM-01_25_28

Theory : rationals


Home Index