Nuprl Lemma : simple-cbva-seq-sqequal-n

∀L:Top. ∀F1,F2:Base. ∀m,n:ℕ.
  (((m ≤ (n + 2)) ⇒ (F1 ~(n - m) + 2 F2)) ⇒ (simple-cbva-seq(L;F1;m) ~n simple-cbva-seq(L;F2;m)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  simple-cbva-seq: simple-cbva-seq(L;F;m),  nat: ℕ,  top: Top,  le: A ≤ B,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  subtract: n - m,  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  base: Base,  sqequal_n: s ~n t
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  simple-cbva-seq: simple-cbva-seq(L;F;m),  cbva-seq: cbva-seq(L;F;m),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  not: ¬A,  ge: i ≥ j ,  int_upper: {i...},  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  callbyvalueall-seq: callbyvalueall-seq(L;G;F;n;m),  le_int: i ≤z j,  lt_int: i <z j,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_apply: x[s],  callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall
Lemmas referenced :  decidable__lt,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  int_upper_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  le_wf,  nat_properties,  nequal-le-implies,  zero-add,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  sqequal_n_wf,  subtract_wf,  decidable__le,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  nat_wf,  base_wf,  top_wf,  int_subtype_base,  btrue_wf,  assert_of_le_int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  decidable__equal_int,  sqequal_n_add,  add-subtract-cancel,  le_int_wf,  int_upper_properties,  less_than_wf,  all_wf,  set_subtype_base,  set_wf,  primrec-wf2,  mk_lambdas-sqequal-n2,  general_arith_equation1
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  sqequal_n rule,  thin,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  addEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  unionElimination,  promote_hyp,  isectElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  sqequalRule,  dependent_pairFormation,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  because_Cache,  voidElimination,  hypothesis_subsumption,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  sqequalZero,  sqequalnReflexivity,  functionEquality,  baseClosed,  applyLambdaEquality,  imageElimination,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  applyEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}L:Top.  \mforall{}F1,F2:Base.  \mforall{}m,n:\mBbbN{}.
    (((m  \mleq{}  (n  +  2))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (F1  \msim{}(n  -  m)  +  2  F2))  {}\mRightarrow{}  (simple-cbva-seq(L;F1;m)  \msim{}n  simple-cbva-seq(L;F2;m)))



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-08_43_15
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-04_29_38

Theory : untyped!computation


Home Index