Nuprl Lemma : bpa-equiv-equiv

∀[p:{2...}]. EquivRel(basic-padic(p);x,y.bpa-equiv(p;x;y))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bpa-equiv: bpa-equiv(p;x;y),  basic-padic: basic-padic(p),  equiv_rel: EquivRel(T;x,y.E[x; y]),  int_upper: {i...},  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  crng: CRng,  rng: Rng,  p-adic-ring: ℤ(p),  ring_p: IsRing(T;plus;zero;neg;times;one),  rng_car: |r|,  pi1: fst(t),  rng_plus: +r,  pi2: snd(t),  rng_zero: 0,  rng_minus: -r,  rng_times: *,  rng_one: 1,  monoid_p: IsMonoid(T;op;id),  group_p: IsGroup(T;op;id;inv),  bilinear: BiLinear(T;pl;tm),  ident: Ident(T;op;id),  assoc: Assoc(T;op),  inverse: Inverse(T;op;id;inv),  infix_ap: x f y,  comm: Comm(T;op),  and: P ∧ Q,  equiv_rel: EquivRel(T;x,y.E[x; y]),  refl: Refl(T;x,y.E[x; y]),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  basic-padic: basic-padic(p),  bpa-equiv: bpa-equiv(p;x;y),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  int_upper: {i...},  nat: ℕ,  le: A ≤ B,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  prop: ℙ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uimplies: b supposing a,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  top: Top,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  cand: A c∧ B,  sym: Sym(T;x,y.E[x; y]),  trans: Trans(T;x,y.E[x; y]),  squash: ↓T,  guard: {T},  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  p-adics: p-adics(p),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  subtract: n - m,  int_seg: {i..j-},  so_apply: x[s]
Lemmas referenced :  p-adic-ring_wf,  crng_properties,  rng_properties,  p-mul_wf,  decidable__lt,  false_wf,  not-lt-2,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-commutes,  zero-add,  le-add-cancel,  less_than_wf,  p-int_wf,  exp_wf2,  basic-padic_wf,  bpa-equiv_wf,  int_upper_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  p-adics_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  p-adic-property,  nat_plus_properties,  nat_properties,  int_upper_properties,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  le_wf,  p-mul-comm,  all_wf,  eqmod_wf,  less-iff-le,  condition-implies-le,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-associates,  add-zero,  int_seg_wf,  equal_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  p-mul-int-cancelation-1
Rules used in proof :  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  hypothesis,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  applyLambdaEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  sqequalRule,  productElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  lambdaFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  voidElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  intEquality,  because_Cache,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  equalityUniverse,  levelHypothesis,  addEquality,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  minusEquality,  universeEquality,  instantiate

Latex:
\mforall{}[p:\{2...\}].  EquivRel(basic-padic(p);x,y.bpa-equiv(p;x;y))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-03_24_49
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_19-AM-08_22_45

Theory : rings_1


Home Index