Nuprl Lemma : nc-se'-p

∀[J:fset(ℕ)]. ∀[k,z:ℕ]. ∀[n:{n:ℕ| ¬n ∈ J} ].  (s,z=n ⋅ (n/<k>) = e(z;k) ∈ J+k ⟶ J+z)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  nc-e': g,i=j,  nc-e: e(i;j),  nc-p: (i/z),  nc-s: s,  add-name: I+i,  nh-comp: g ⋅ f,  names-hom: I ⟶ J,  dM_inc: <x>,  fset-member: a ∈ s,  fset: fset(T),  int-deq: IntDeq,  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  not: ¬A,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  top: Top,  names-hom: I ⟶ J,  compose: f o g,  nc-e: e(i;j),  nc-s: s,  nc-e': g,i=j,  names: names(I),  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  squash: ↓T,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  prop: ℙ,  true: True,  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  nc-p: (i/z),  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  not: ¬A,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  decidable: Dec(P)
Lemmas referenced :  nh-comp-sq,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  equal_wf,  lattice-point_wf,  dM_wf,  add-name_wf,  dM-lift-inc,  nc-p_wf,  dM_inc_wf,  trivial-member-add-name1,  fset-member_wf,  nat_wf,  int-deq_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  not-added-name,  strong-subtype-deq-subtype,  strong-subtype-set3,  le_wf,  strong-subtype-self,  names_wf,  set_wf,  not_wf,  fset_wf,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  names-subtype,  f-subset-add-name1,  f-subset-add-name,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  deq_wf,  sq_stable__fset-member,  decidable__le,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalRule,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  hypothesis,  functionExtensionality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  lambdaFormation,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  imageElimination,  because_Cache,  dependent_functionElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  intEquality,  universeEquality,  axiomEquality,  int_eqEquality,  computeAll,  applyLambdaEquality,  hyp_replacement,  independent_pairFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}[J:fset(\mBbbN{})].  \mforall{}[k,z:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[n:\{n:\mBbbN{}|  \mneg{}n  \mmember{}  J\}  ].    (s,z=n  \mcdot{}  (n/<k>)  =  e(z;k))



Date html generated: 2017_10_05-AM-01_06_54
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_28-AM-09_28_06

Theory : cubical!type!theory


Home Index