Nuprl Lemma : append-finite-nat-seq-1

∀n,a,b:finite-nat-seq(). ∀x:ℕ.
  ((↑init-seg-nat-seq(n**λi.x^(1);a**b)) ⇒ ((↑init-seg-nat-seq(a;n)) ∨ (↑init-seg-nat-seq(n**λi.x^(1);a))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  init-seg-nat-seq: init-seg-nat-seq(f;g),  append-finite-nat-seq: f**g,  mk-finite-nat-seq: f^(n),  finite-nat-seq: finite-nat-seq(),  nat: ℕ,  assert: ↑b,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  or: P ∨ Q,  lambda: λx.A[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  finite-nat-seq: finite-nat-seq(),  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  mk-finite-nat-seq: f^(n),  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  append-finite-nat-seq: f**g,  pi1: fst(t),  pi2: snd(t),  int_seg: {i..j-},  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uimplies: b supposing a,  less_than: a < b,  top: Top,  true: True,  squash: ↓T,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b,  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s]
Lemmas referenced :  assert_wf,  init-seg-nat-seq_wf,  append-finite-nat-seq_wf,  mk-finite-nat-seq_wf,  false_wf,  le_wf,  int_seg_wf,  nat_wf,  finite-nat-seq_wf,  decidable__le,  assert-init-seg-nat-seq2,  lt_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  top_wf,  less_than_wf,  lelt_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  int_seg_properties,  nat_properties,  decidable__equal_int,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  subtype_rel_function,  int_seg_subtype,  add-is-int-iff,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  subtype_rel_self,  intformeq_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  decidable__lt
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  hypothesis,  lambdaEquality,  productElimination,  rename,  dependent_functionElimination,  addEquality,  setElimination,  unionElimination,  inrFormation,  functionExtensionality,  applyEquality,  because_Cache,  independent_functionElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_isectElimination,  lessCases,  isect_memberFormation,  axiomSqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  approximateComputation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  functionEquality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  inlFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}n,a,b:finite-nat-seq().  \mforall{}x:\mBbbN{}.
    ((\muparrow{}init-seg-nat-seq(n**\mlambda{}i.x\^{}(1);a**b))
    {}\mRightarrow{}  ((\muparrow{}init-seg-nat-seq(a;n))  \mvee{}  (\muparrow{}init-seg-nat-seq(n**\mlambda{}i.x\^{}(1);a))))



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-03_03_42
Last ObjectModification: 2018_08_20-PM-09_41_20

Theory : continuity


Home Index