Nuprl Lemma : p-reduce-eqmod-exp

∀p:ℕ+. ∀n:ℕ. ∀m:{n...}. ∀z:ℤ.  (z mod(p^m) ≡ z mod p^n)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  p-reduce: i mod(p^n),  eqmod: a ≡ b mod m,  exp: i^n,  int_upper: {i...},  nat_plus: ℕ+,  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  int_upper: {i...},  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  guard: {T},  nat_plus: ℕ+,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  and: P ∧ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  p-reduce: i mod(p^n),  label: ...$L... t,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  true: True,  squash: ↓T,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  eqmod: a ≡ b mod m,  divides: b | a,  le: A ≤ B,  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T 
Lemmas referenced :  subtype_base_sq,  int_upper_wf,  set_subtype_base,  le_wf,  int_subtype_base,  int_upper_properties,  nat_properties,  nat_plus_properties,  decidable__equal_int,  subtract_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  decidable__le,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  itermConstant_wf,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  equal_wf,  nat_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  exp_wf2,  multiply-is-int-iff,  itermMultiply_wf,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  false_wf,  exp-positive-stronger,  less_than_wf,  int-subtype-int_mod,  eqmod_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  modulus_wf_int_mod,  int_mod_wf,  exp_add,  int_seg_wf,  int_seg_properties,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  mod-eqmod,  mul_nat_plus,  exp_wf_nat_plus,  subtract-is-int-iff,  mod_bounds_1,  mul_nzero,  exp_wf3,  subtype_rel_sets,  nequal_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  equal-wf-base
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  thin,  instantiate,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  hypothesis,  independent_isectElimination,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  addEquality,  unionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  pointwiseFunctionality,  promote_hyp,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  productElimination,  applyEquality,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  universeEquality,  multiplyEquality,  setEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}p:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}.  \mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}m:\{n...\}.  \mforall{}z:\mBbbZ{}.    (z  mod(p\^{}m)  \mequiv{}  z  mod  p\^{}n)



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-03_18_06
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_19-AM-08_09_10

Theory : rings_1


Home Index