Nuprl Lemma : coSet-seteq-Set

[s:Set{i:l}]. ∀[z:coSet{i:l}].  z ∈ Set{i:l} supposing seteq(z;s)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  Set: Set{i:l} seteq: seteq(s1;s2) coSet: coSet{i:l} uimplies: supposing a uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T Set: Set{i:l} uimplies: supposing a prop: subtype_rel: A ⊆B all: x:A. B[x] so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] and: P ∧ Q implies:  Q pcw-pp-barred: Barred(pp) nat: int_seg: {i..j-} lelt: i ≤ j < k ge: i ≥  decidable: Dec(P) or: P ∨ Q not: ¬A satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) exists: x:A. B[x] false: False top: Top cw-step: cw-step(A;a.B[a]) pcw-step: pcw-step(P;p.A[p];p,a.B[p; a];p,a,b.C[p; a; b]) spreadn: spread3 less_than: a < b less_than': less_than'(a;b) true: True squash: T isr: isr(x) assert: b ifthenelse: if then else fi  bfalse: ff btrue: tt ext-eq: A ≡ B unit: Unit it: so_lambda: λ2y.t[x; y] so_apply: x[s1;s2] so_lambda: so_lambda(x,y,z.t[x; y; z]) so_apply: x[s1;s2;s3] ext-family: F ≡ G pi1: fst(t) nat_plus: + W-rel: W-rel(A;a.B[a];w) param-W-rel: param-W-rel(P;p.A[p];p,a.B[p; a];p,a,b.C[p; a; b];par;w) pcw-steprel: StepRel(s1;s2) pi2: snd(t) isl: isl(x) pcw-step-agree: StepAgree(s;p1;w) cand: c∧ B guard: {T} Wsup: Wsup(a;b) sq_type: SQType(T) le: A ≤ B sq_stable: SqStable(P) mk-set: f"(T) iff: ⇐⇒ Q set-dom: set-dom(s) set-item: set-item(s;x) mk-coset: mk-coset(T;f) rev_implies:  Q equiv_rel: EquivRel(T;x,y.E[x; y]) refl: Refl(T;x,y.E[x; y])
Lemmas referenced :  seteq_wf set-subtype-coSet coSet_wf Set_wf W-elimination-facts subtype_rel_self int_seg_wf subtract_wf nat_properties decidable__le full-omega-unsat intformand_wf intformnot_wf intformle_wf itermConstant_wf itermSubtract_wf itermVar_wf intformless_wf int_formula_prop_and_lemma int_formula_prop_not_lemma int_formula_prop_le_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma int_term_value_subtract_lemma int_term_value_var_lemma int_formula_prop_less_lemma int_formula_prop_wf decidable__lt lelt_wf top_wf less_than_wf false_wf true_wf equal_wf add-subtract-cancel itermAdd_wf int_term_value_add_lemma W-ext param-co-W-ext unit_wf2 it_wf param-co-W_wf pcw-steprel_wf subtype_rel_dep_function subtype_base_sq nat_wf set_subtype_base le_wf int_subtype_base decidable__equal_int intformeq_wf int_formula_prop_eq_lemma subtype_rel_function int_seg_subtype sq_stable__le mk-set_wf setmem_wf co-seteq-iff setmem-iff subtype_coSet coSet_subtype mk-coset_wf seteq-equiv
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isect_memberFormation introduction cut sqequalHypSubstitution sqequalRule isect_memberEquality isectElimination thin hypothesisEquality axiomEquality equalityTransitivity hypothesis equalitySymmetry extract_by_obid applyEquality instantiate dependent_functionElimination universeEquality lambdaEquality cumulativity productElimination strong_bar_Induction independent_functionElimination functionExtensionality natural_numberEquality setElimination rename dependent_set_memberEquality because_Cache independent_pairFormation unionElimination independent_isectElimination approximateComputation dependent_pairFormation int_eqEquality intEquality voidElimination voidEquality lambdaFormation lessCases axiomSqEquality imageMemberEquality baseClosed imageElimination addEquality int_eqReduceTrueSq promote_hyp hypothesis_subsumption equalityElimination dependent_pairEquality inlEquality unionEquality productEquality hyp_replacement applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[s:Set\{i:l\}].  \mforall{}[z:coSet\{i:l\}].    z  \mmember{}  Set\{i:l\}  supposing  seteq(z;s)



Date html generated: 2019_10_31-AM-06_33_08
Last ObjectModification: 2018_08_23-AM-11_49_54

Theory : constructive!set!theory


Home Index