Nuprl Lemma : constant-limit

∀a,b:ℝ.  (lim n→∞.a = b ⇐⇒ a = b)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  converges-to: lim n→∞.x[n] = y,  req: x = y,  real: ℝ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  converges-to: lim n→∞.x[n] = y,  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  squash: ↓T,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  le: A ≤ B,  rnonneg: rnonneg(x),  rleq: x ≤ y,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  top: Top,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  decidable: Dec(P),  ge: i ≥ j ,  or: P ∨ Q,  guard: {T},  rneq: x ≠ y,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  nat: ℕ,  sq_exists: ∃x:{A| B[x]},  uimplies: b supposing a,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  absval: |i|,  itermConstant: "const",  req_int_terms: t1 ≡ t2,  rdiv: (x/y)
Lemmas referenced :  converges-to_wf,  nat_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  req_wf,  real_wf,  false_wf,  le_wf,  all_wf,  rleq_wf,  rabs_wf,  rsub_wf,  rdiv_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  rless-int,  nat_properties,  nat_plus_properties,  decidable__lt,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  rless_wf,  absval_wf,  rinv_wf2,  rmul_wf,  rleq-int-fractions2,  decidable__le,  intformle_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  rleq_functionality,  rabs_functionality,  rsub_functionality,  req_weakening,  uiff_transitivity2,  real_term_polynomial,  itermSubtract_wf,  real_term_value_const_lemma,  real_term_value_sub_lemma,  real_term_value_var_lemma,  req-iff-rsub-is-0,  req_transitivity,  real_term_value_mul_lemma,  rinv-as-rdiv,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  rabs-int,  infinitesmal-difference,  sq_stable__all,  sq_stable__rleq,  less_than'_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  independent_pairFormation,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  thin,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  imageElimination,  baseClosed,  imageMemberEquality,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  axiomEquality,  minusEquality,  applyEquality,  independent_pairEquality,  computeAll,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  unionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  because_Cache,  inrFormation,  natural_numberEquality,  functionEquality,  rename,  setElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberFormation,  independent_isectElimination,  productElimination,  lemma_by_obid,  dependent_set_memberFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  multiplyEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}a,b:\mBbbR{}.    (lim  n\mrightarrow{}\minfty{}.a  =  b  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  a  =  b)



Date html generated: 2017_10_03-AM-09_05_04
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_28-AM-07_41_19

Theory : reals


Home Index