Nuprl Lemma : r2-det-is-dot-product

∀[a,b,c:ℝ^2].  (|abc| = a - b⋅λi.if (i =z 0) then -(c - b 1) else c - b 0 fi )


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  r2-det: |pqr|,  dot-product: x⋅y,  real-vec-sub: X - Y,  real-vec: ℝ^n,  req: x = y,  rminus: -(x),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  eq_int: (i =z j),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  apply: f a,  lambda: λx.A[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  real-vec-sub: X - Y,  dot-product: x⋅y,  r2-det: |pqr|,  subtract: n - m,  nat: ℕ,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  real-vec: ℝ^n,  int_seg: {i..j-},  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uimplies: b supposing a,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  decidable: Dec(P),  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  so_apply: x[s],  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  eq_int: (i =z j),  itermConstant: "const",  req_int_terms: t1 ≡ t2,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  req_witness,  r2-det_wf,  dot-product_wf,  false_wf,  le_wf,  real-vec-sub_wf,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  rminus_wf,  real-vec_wf,  lelt_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  int_seg_wf,  rsub_wf,  radd_wf,  rmul_wf,  rsum_wf,  decidable__lt,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  decidable__le,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  equal-wf-base,  int_subtype_base,  real_term_polynomial,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  itermMinus_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  real_term_value_const_lemma,  real_term_value_sub_lemma,  real_term_value_add_lemma,  real_term_value_mul_lemma,  real_term_value_var_lemma,  real_term_value_minus_lemma,  req-iff-rsub-is-0,  req_functionality,  req_weakening,  rsum-split-first,  radd_functionality,  rsum-single
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalRule,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  lambdaFormation,  because_Cache,  lambdaEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  applyEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  dependent_functionElimination,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  addEquality,  setEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[a,b,c:\mBbbR{}\^{}2].    (|abc|  =  a  -  b\mcdot{}\mlambda{}i.if  (i  =\msubz{}  0)  then  -(c  -  b  1)  else  c  -  b  0  fi  )



Date html generated: 2017_10_03-AM-11_40_36
Last ObjectModification: 2017_04_11-PM-05_29_09

Theory : reals


Home Index