Nuprl Lemma : series-sum-constant

∀x:ℝ. Σi.if (i =z 0) then x else r0 fi  = x


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  series-sum: Σn.x[n] = a,  int-to-real: r(n),  real: ℝ,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  eq_int: (i =z j),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  series-sum: Σn.x[n] = a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  nat: ℕ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  int_seg: {i..j-},  so_apply: x[s],  guard: {T},  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  prop: ℙ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  eq_int: (i =z j),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  pointwise-req: x[k] = y[k] for k ∈ [n,m],  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b
Lemmas referenced :  constant-limit,  req_weakening,  real_wf,  nat_wf,  rsum_wf,  ifthenelse_wf,  eq_int_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  int_seg_wf,  converges-to_functionality,  radd_wf,  subtract_wf,  false_wf,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  equal-wf-base,  int_subtype_base,  rsum-split-shift,  req_functionality,  radd_functionality,  rsum-single,  rsum_functionality,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  le_wf,  rmul_wf,  req_wf,  rsum-constant,  uiff_transitivity,  rmul-zero-both,  radd_comm,  radd-zero-both
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  sqequalReflexivity,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  because_Cache,  productElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  isectElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  hypothesis,  lambdaEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  addEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  setEquality,  applyEquality,  baseClosed,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity

Latex:
\mforall{}x:\mBbbR{}.  \mSigma{}i.if  (i  =\msubz{}  0)  then  x  else  r0  fi    =  x



Date html generated: 2017_10_03-AM-09_17_49
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_28-AM-07_43_11

Theory : reals


Home Index