Nuprl Lemma : rel-exp-add-iff

∀[T:Type]. ∀[R:T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ].  ∀a,b:ℕ. ∀x,z:T.  (x R^a + b z ⇐⇒ ∃y:T. ((x R^a y) ∧ (y R^b z)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rel_exp: R^n,  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  infix_ap: x f y,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  infix_ap: x f y,  cand: A c∧ B,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  rel_exp: R^n,  eq_int: (i =z j),  subtract: n - m,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  bfalse: ff,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅
Lemmas referenced :  infix_ap_wf,  rel_exp_wf,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  le_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  all_wf,  nat_wf,  subtract_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  exists_wf,  set_wf,  less_than_wf,  primrec-wf2,  zero-add,  false_wf,  eq_int_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  assert_wf,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  bool_cases,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bnot,  general_arith_equation1,  equal-wf-base,  int_subtype_base,  uiff_transitivity,  equal_wf,  rel_exp_add
Rules used in proof :  cut,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaFormation,  thin,  instantiate,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  because_Cache,  universeEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesis,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  functionExtensionality,  applyEquality,  functionEquality,  productEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  baseClosed,  productElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  impliesFunctionality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  equalityElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[R:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].
    \mforall{}a,b:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}x,z:T.    (x  R\^{}a  +  b  z  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  \mexists{}y:T.  ((x  R\^{}a  y)  \mwedge{}  (y  rel\_exp(T;  R;  b)  z)))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-09_28_17
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_29_07

Theory : relations2


Home Index