Nuprl Lemma : rel_exp_add

∀[T:Type]. ∀[R:T ⟶ T ⟶ ℙ].  ∀m,n:ℕ.  ∀[x,y,z:T].  ((x R^m y) ⇒ (y R^n z) ⇒ (x R^m + n z))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rel_exp: R^n,  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  infix_ap: x f y,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  add: n + m,  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  member: t ∈ T,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  guard: {T},  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  squash: ↓T,  so_apply: x[s],  infix_ap: x f y,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  uimplies: b supposing a,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  rel_exp: R^n,  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  bfalse: ff,  subtract: n - m,  ge: i ≥ j ,  top: Top,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  less_than: a < b,  true: True,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  cand: A c∧ B,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  decidable: Dec(P)
Lemmas referenced :  complete_nat_ind_with_y,  all_wf,  nat_wf,  uall_wf,  infix_ap_wf,  rel_exp_wf,  add_nat_wf,  sq_stable__le,  equal_wf,  le_wf,  int_seg_wf,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  eq_int_wf,  assert_wf,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  bool_cases,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bnot,  int_subtype_base,  and_wf,  subtract_wf,  minus-zero,  zero-add,  add-zero,  nat_properties,  add-associates,  add-mul-special,  zero-mul,  not-equal-implies-less,  subtype_rel_self,  less-iff-le,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  le_reflexive,  minus-one-mul-top,  one-mul,  add-commutes,  minus-one-mul,  mul-associates,  omega-shadow,  less_than_wf,  two-mul,  mul-distributes-right,  add-swap,  mul-distributes,  minus-add,  mul-commutes,  mul-swap,  not-le-2,  le-add-cancel,  uiff_transitivity,  decidable__le,  general_arith_equation1,  not-equal-2,  condition-implies-le,  minus-minus,  decidable__lt,  not-lt-2,  le-add-cancel-alt,  lelt_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  cut,  thin,  instantiate,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  hypothesis,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  because_Cache,  functionEquality,  universeEquality,  functionExtensionality,  applyEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  lambdaFormation,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  productElimination,  intEquality,  unionElimination,  impliesFunctionality,  addLevel,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  levelHypothesis,  multiplyEquality,  minusEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  promote_hyp,  dependent_pairFormation,  productEquality,  equalityElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[R:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}].
    \mforall{}m,n:\mBbbN{}.    \mforall{}[x,y,z:T].    ((x  R\^{}m  y)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (y  R\^{}n  z)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (x  rel\_exp(T;  R;  m  +  n)  z))



Date html generated: 2017_04_14-AM-07_38_14
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-03_10_26

Theory : relations


Home Index