Nuprl Lemma : bag-map-filter

∀[T,A:Type]. ∀[f:T ⟶ A]. ∀[P:T ⟶ 𝔹]. ∀[Q:A ⟶ 𝔹].
  ∀[L:bag(T)]. (bag-map(f;[x∈L|P[x]]) = [x∈bag-map(f;L)|Q[x]] ∈ bag(A)) supposing ∀x:T. Q[f x] = P[x]


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bag-filter: [x∈b|p[x]],  bag-map: bag-map(f;bs),  bag: bag(T),  bool: 𝔹,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  bag: bag(T),  quotient: x,y:A//B[x; y],  and: P ∧ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  bag-map: bag-map(f;bs),  bag-filter: [x∈b|p[x]],  nat: ℕ,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  guard: {T},  or: P ∨ Q,  cons: [a / b],  colength: colength(L),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  decidable: Dec(P),  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  sq_type: SQType(T),  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b
Lemmas referenced :  bag_wf,  list_wf,  permutation_wf,  equal_wf,  equal-wf-base,  all_wf,  bool_wf,  map-filter,  map_wf,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  nat_wf,  colength_wf_list,  less_than_transitivity1,  less_than_irreflexivity,  list-cases,  filter_nil_lemma,  product_subtype_list,  spread_cons_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  le_wf,  subtract_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  subtype_base_sq,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  decidable__equal_int,  filter_cons_lemma,  eqtt_to_assert,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  quotient-member-eq,  permutation-equiv,  bag-filter_wf,  bag-map_wf,  list-subtype-bag,  subtype_rel_bag,  assert_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  pointwiseFunctionalityForEquality,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  thin,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  pertypeElimination,  productElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  lambdaFormation,  because_Cache,  rename,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  productEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  axiomEquality,  lambdaEquality,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  functionEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  setElimination,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  sqequalAxiom,  unionElimination,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  applyLambdaEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  baseClosed,  instantiate,  imageElimination,  equalityElimination,  setEquality,  hyp_replacement

Latex:
\mforall{}[T,A:Type].  \mforall{}[f:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  A].  \mforall{}[P:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}].  \mforall{}[Q:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}].
    \mforall{}[L:bag(T)].  (bag-map(f;[x\mmember{}L|P[x]])  =  [x\mmember{}bag-map(f;L)|Q[x]])  supposing  \mforall{}x:T.  Q[f  x]  =  P[x]



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-08_46_01
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-04_31_04

Theory : bags


Home Index