Nuprl Lemma : bag-drop-append

∀[T:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(T)]. ∀[x:T]. ∀[bs,cs:bag(T)].
  (bag-drop(eq;bs + cs;x) = if ((#x in bs) =z 0) then bs + bag-drop(eq;cs;x) else bag-drop(eq;bs;x) + cs fi  ∈ bag(T))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bag-drop: bag-drop(eq;bs;a),  bag-count: (#x in bs),  bag-append: as + bs,  bag: bag(T),  deq: EqDecider(T),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  eq_int: (i =z j),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  natural_number: $n,  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  nat: ℕ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uimplies: b supposing a,  squash: ↓T,  prop: ℙ,  true: True,  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  sq_or: a ↓∨ b,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  decidable: Dec(P),  ge: i ≥ j ,  eq_int: (i =z j),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  bag-drop-property,  bag-append_wf,  bag_wf,  bag-append-cancel,  single-bag_wf,  bag-drop_wf,  ifthenelse_wf,  eq_int_wf,  bag-count_wf,  nat_wf,  bag-member_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  bag-member-append,  bag-member-single,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  bag-member-count,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  bag-append-assoc-comm,  bag-append-assoc2,  decidable__le,  nat_properties,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  set_subtype_base,  le_wf,  int_subtype_base,  decidable__equal_nat,  false_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  equal-wf-T-base
Rules used in proof :  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  hypothesis,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  productElimination,  sqequalRule,  isect_memberEquality,  axiomEquality,  because_Cache,  universeEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  instantiate,  independent_functionElimination,  inlFormation,  lambdaFormation,  equalityElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  cumulativity,  voidElimination,  approximateComputation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  applyLambdaEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  inrFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(T)].  \mforall{}[x:T].  \mforall{}[bs,cs:bag(T)].
    (bag-drop(eq;bs  +  cs;x)
    =  if  ((\#x  in  bs)  =\msubz{}  0)  then  bs  +  bag-drop(eq;cs;x)  else  bag-drop(eq;bs;x)  +  cs  fi  )



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_48_30
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_19-PM-04_20_23

Theory : bags_2


Home Index