Nuprl Lemma : combinations_aux_rem_wf

∀[k:ℕ+]. ∀[n,b,m:ℕ].  (combinations_aux_rem(b;n;m;k) ∈ ℕ)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  combinations_aux_rem: combinations_aux_rem(b;n;m;k),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  combinations_aux_rem: combinations_aux_rem(b;n;m;k),  eq_int: (i =z j),  subtract: n - m,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  has-value: (a)↓,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b)
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  decidable__le,  subtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  nat_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  equal-wf-base,  int_subtype_base,  assert_wf,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  value-type-has-value,  decidable__equal_int,  subtype_base_sq,  uiff_transitivity,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_bnot,  equal_wf,  mul-zero,  zero-rem,  subtype_rel_sets,  nequal_wf,  nat_plus_properties,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int-value-type,  zero-mul,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  le_wf,  false_wf,  remainder_wf,  mul_bounds_1a
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  sqequalRule,  intWeakElimination,  lambdaFormation,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  lambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  because_Cache,  callbyvalueReduce,  sqleReflexivity,  unionElimination,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  applyEquality,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  equalityElimination,  productElimination,  impliesFunctionality,  setEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  remainderEquality,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  multiplyEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[k:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}].  \mforall{}[n,b,m:\mBbbN{}].    (combinations\_aux\_rem(b;n;m;k)  \mmember{}  \mBbbN{})



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-08_10_43
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-05_46_13

Theory : general


Home Index