Nuprl Lemma : q-constraint-times

∀[x:ℕ ⟶ ℚ]. ∀[r:ℤ]. ∀[a:ℚ]. ∀[k:ℕ]. ∀[y:ℚ List].
  (q-rel(r;q-linear(k;j.a * (x j);y))) supposing 
     (q-rel(r;q-linear(k;j.x j;y)) and 
     ((r = 0 ∈ ℤ) ∨ 0 < a ∨ ((0 ≤ a) ∧ (r = 1 ∈ ℤ))) and 
     (k ≤ ||y||))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  q-rel: q-rel(r;x),  q-linear: q-linear(k;i.X[i];y),  qle: r ≤ s,  qless: r < s,  qmul: r * s,  rationals: ℚ,  length: ||as||,  list: T List,  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  le: A ≤ B,  or: P ∨ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  squash: ↓T,  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  guard: {T},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  q-rel: q-rel(r;x),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bool: 𝔹,  nat: ℕ,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  cand: A c∧ B,  not: ¬A,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff
Lemmas referenced :  q-rel_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  rationals_wf,  q-linear-times,  nat_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  equal-wf-base-T,  q-linear_wf,  qmul_wf,  qle_witness,  int-subtype-rationals,  qle_wf,  qless_witness,  qless_wf,  equal_wf,  ifthenelse_wf,  eq_int_wf,  or_wf,  equal-wf-base,  le_wf,  length_wf,  list_wf,  bool_wf,  assert_wf,  qmul_comm_qrng,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  qmul_preserves_qle2,  qle_weakening_lt_qorder,  qmul-positive,  uiff_transitivity,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_bnot,  qmul_zero_qrng
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  applyEquality,  thin,  lambdaEquality,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  imageElimination,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  hypothesis,  equalitySymmetry,  intEquality,  sqequalRule,  functionExtensionality,  independent_isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  universeEquality,  productElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  dependent_functionElimination,  because_Cache,  lambdaFormation,  axiomEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  productEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  functionEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  voidElimination,  promote_hyp,  dependent_pairFormation,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  inlFormation,  independent_pairFormation,  minusEquality,  equalityElimination,  impliesFunctionality

Latex:
\mforall{}[x:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbQ{}].  \mforall{}[r:\mBbbZ{}].  \mforall{}[a:\mBbbQ{}].  \mforall{}[k:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[y:\mBbbQ{}  List].
    (q-rel(r;q-linear(k;j.a  *  (x  j);y)))  supposing 
          (q-rel(r;q-linear(k;j.x  j;y))  and 
          ((r  =  0)  \mvee{}  0  <  a  \mvee{}  ((0  \mleq{}  a)  \mwedge{}  (r  =  1)))  and 
          (k  \mleq{}  ||y||))



Date html generated: 2018_05_22-AM-00_19_08
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_53_53

Theory : rationals


Home Index