Nuprl Lemma : mk_lambdas_fun_compose1

[f:Top]. ∀[k,m:ℕ]. ∀[n:ℕ1].
  (mk_lambdas_fun(λh.mk_lambdas(h mk_lambdas_fun(f;n);k);m) 
  mk_lambdas_fun(λg.mk_lambdas_fun(λh.mk_lambdas(h (f g);k);m n);n))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  mk_lambdas: mk_lambdas(F;m) mk_lambdas_fun: mk_lambdas_fun(F;m) int_seg: {i..j-} nat: uall: [x:A]. B[x] top: Top apply: a lambda: λx.A[x] subtract: m add: m natural_number: $n sqequal: t
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T nat: int_seg: {i..j-} lelt: i ≤ j < k and: P ∧ Q subtype_rel: A ⊆B prop: all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q false: False ge: i ≥  uimplies: supposing a satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) exists: x:A. B[x] not: ¬A top: Top mk_lambdas_fun: mk_lambdas_fun(F;m) mk_lambdas-fun: mk_lambdas-fun(F;G;n;m) le_int: i ≤j lt_int: i <j bnot: ¬bb ifthenelse: if then else fi  bfalse: ff bool: 𝔹 unit: Unit it: btrue: tt uiff: uiff(P;Q) so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] decidable: Dec(P) or: P ∨ Q sq_type: SQType(T) guard: {T} assert: b le: A ≤ B less_than': less_than'(a;b) true: True nat_plus: + iff: ⇐⇒ Q rev_implies:  Q subtract: m
Lemmas referenced :  int_seg_properties nat_wf le_wf int_seg_wf top_wf nat_properties satisfiable-full-omega-tt intformand_wf intformle_wf itermConstant_wf itermVar_wf intformless_wf int_formula_prop_and_lemma int_formula_prop_le_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma int_term_value_var_lemma int_formula_prop_less_lemma int_formula_prop_wf ge_wf less_than_wf base_wf btrue_wf bool_wf eqtt_to_assert assert_of_le_int subtype_base_sq set_subtype_base int_subtype_base decidable__equal_int subtract_wf intformnot_wf intformeq_wf itermSubtract_wf int_formula_prop_not_lemma int_formula_prop_eq_lemma int_term_value_subtract_lemma decidable__le itermAdd_wf int_term_value_add_lemma eqff_to_assert le_int_wf equal_wf bool_cases_sqequal bool_subtype_base assert-bnot bfalse_wf mk_lambdas_fun-unroll-first decidable__lt false_wf not-lt-2 le_antisymmetry_iff less-iff-le condition-implies-le add-associates minus-add minus-one-mul add-swap minus-one-mul-top zero-add add_functionality_wrt_le add-commutes le-add-cancel2 add-zero subtract-add-cancel
Rules used in proof :  cut sqequalRule thin introduction extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isectElimination natural_numberEquality addEquality setElimination rename hypothesisEquality hypothesis productElimination hypothesis_subsumption lambdaEquality dependent_set_memberEquality dependent_functionElimination independent_functionElimination because_Cache isect_memberFormation sqequalAxiom isect_memberEquality intWeakElimination lambdaFormation independent_isectElimination dependent_pairFormation int_eqEquality intEquality voidElimination voidEquality independent_pairFormation computeAll unionElimination equalityElimination equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry instantiate promote_hyp cumulativity applyEquality minusEquality baseApply closedConclusion baseClosed

Latex:
\mforall{}[f:Top].  \mforall{}[k,m:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}m  +  1].
    (mk\_lambdas\_fun(\mlambda{}h.mk\_lambdas(h  mk\_lambdas\_fun(f;n);k);m) 
    \msim{}  mk\_lambdas\_fun(\mlambda{}g.mk\_lambdas\_fun(\mlambda{}h.mk\_lambdas(h  (f  g);k);m  -  n);n))



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-08_40_56
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-04_28_18

Theory : untyped!computation


Home Index