Nuprl Lemma : mk_lambdas_fun_compose1

∀[f:Top]. ∀[k,m:ℕ]. ∀[n:ℕm + 1].
  (mk_lambdas_fun(λh.mk_lambdas(h mk_lambdas_fun(f;n);k);m) 
  ~ mk_lambdas_fun(λg.mk_lambdas_fun(λh.mk_lambdas(h (f g);k);m - n);n))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  mk_lambdas: mk_lambdas(F;m),  mk_lambdas_fun: mk_lambdas_fun(F;m),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  top: Top,  apply: f a,  lambda: λx.A[x],  subtract: n - m,  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  sqequal: s ~ t
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  and: P ∧ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  prop: ℙ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  mk_lambdas_fun: mk_lambdas_fun(F;m),  mk_lambdas-fun: mk_lambdas-fun(F;G;n;m),  le_int: i ≤z j,  lt_int: i <z j,  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  assert: ↑b,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  subtract: n - m
Lemmas referenced :  int_seg_properties,  nat_wf,  le_wf,  int_seg_wf,  top_wf,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  base_wf,  btrue_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_le_int,  subtype_base_sq,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  decidable__equal_int,  subtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  decidable__le,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  eqff_to_assert,  le_int_wf,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  bfalse_wf,  mk_lambdas_fun-unroll-first,  decidable__lt,  false_wf,  not-lt-2,  le_antisymmetry_iff,  less-iff-le,  condition-implies-le,  add-associates,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  add-swap,  minus-one-mul-top,  zero-add,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-commutes,  le-add-cancel2,  add-zero,  subtract-add-cancel
Rules used in proof :  cut,  sqequalRule,  thin,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  addEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  productElimination,  hypothesis_subsumption,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  because_Cache,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalAxiom,  isect_memberEquality,  intWeakElimination,  lambdaFormation,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  instantiate,  promote_hyp,  cumulativity,  applyEquality,  minusEquality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed

Latex:
\mforall{}[f:Top].  \mforall{}[k,m:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}m  +  1].
    (mk\_lambdas\_fun(\mlambda{}h.mk\_lambdas(h  mk\_lambdas\_fun(f;n);k);m) 
    \msim{}  mk\_lambdas\_fun(\mlambda{}g.mk\_lambdas\_fun(\mlambda{}h.mk\_lambdas(h  (f  g);k);m  -  n);n))



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-08_40_56
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-04_28_18

Theory : untyped!computation


Home Index