Nuprl Lemma : bpa-norm_wf

∀p:ℕ+. ∀x:basic-padic(p).  (bpa-norm(p;x) ∈ basic-padic(p))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bpa-norm: bpa-norm(p;x),  basic-padic: basic-padic(p),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  basic-padic: basic-padic(p),  bpa-norm: bpa-norm(p;x),  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  prop: ℙ,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  ge: i ≥ j ,  int_upper: {i...},  p-adics: p-adics(p),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  decidable: Dec(P),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  top: Top,  true: True,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  p-units: p-units(p),  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
Lemmas referenced :  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  false_wf,  le_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  upper_subtype_nat,  nat_properties,  nequal-le-implies,  zero-add,  decidable__lt,  not-lt-2,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-commutes,  le-add-cancel,  less_than_wf,  int_seg_wf,  exp_wf2,  p-shift_wf,  p-unitize_wf,  not-equal-2,  p-units_wf,  p-adics_wf,  p-mul_wf,  p-int_wf,  subtract_wf,  int_seg_properties,  int_upper_properties,  nat_plus_properties,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  basic-padic_wf,  nat_plus_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  productElimination,  thin,  sqequalRule,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  hypothesis,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_pairEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_pairFormation,  hypothesisEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  dependent_functionElimination,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  hypothesis_subsumption,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  intEquality,  productEquality,  addEquality,  setEquality,  approximateComputation,  int_eqEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}p:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}.  \mforall{}x:basic-padic(p).    (bpa-norm(p;x)  \mmember{}  basic-padic(p))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-03_25_13
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_19-AM-08_22_41

Theory : rings_1


Home Index