Nuprl Lemma : p-unitize-unit

∀p:ℕ+. ∀a:p-units(p). ∀n:ℕ+.  (p-unitize(p;a;n) = <0, a> ∈ (k:ℕ × {b:p-units(p)| p^k(p) * b = a ∈ p-adics(p)} ))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  p-unitize: p-unitize(p;a;n),  p-units: p-units(p),  p-int: k(p),  p-mul: x * y,  p-adics: p-adics(p),  exp: i^n,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  pair: <a, b>,  product: x:A × B[x],  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  p-units: p-units(p),  p-unitize: p-unitize(p;a;n),  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  top: Top,  p-adics: p-adics(p),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  uimplies: b supposing a,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  ge: i ≥ j ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  p-int: k(p),  p-mul: x * y,  p-reduce: i mod(p^n),  int_upper: {i...},  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  false_wf,  le_wf,  exp0_lemma,  not_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  less_than_wf,  equal_wf,  p-adics_wf,  p-mul_wf,  p-int_wf,  p-units_wf,  exp_wf2,  nat_plus_wf,  subtype_base_sq,  nat_wf,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  decidable__equal_nat,  greatest-p-zero_wf,  greatest-p-zero-property,  nat_plus_subtype_nat,  nat_plus_properties,  decidable__lt,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  lelt_wf,  decidable__le,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  nat_properties,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  decidable__equal_int,  p-adics-equal,  modulus_wf_int_mod,  exp_wf_nat_plus,  int-subtype-int_mod,  int_seg_wf,  one-mul,  p-adic-property,  eqmod_functionality_wrt_eqmod,  eqmod_transitivity,  mod-eqmod,  multiply_functionality_wrt_eqmod,  eqmod_weakening
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  setElimination,  thin,  rename,  sqequalRule,  dependent_pairEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  hypothesis,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  intEquality,  applyEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  because_Cache,  setEquality,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_isectElimination,  lambdaEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_functionElimination,  productElimination,  addEquality,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  multiplyEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}p:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}.  \mforall{}a:p-units(p).  \mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}.    (p-unitize(p;a;n)  =  ɘ,  a>)



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-03_22_36
Last ObjectModification: 2018_05_19-AM-08_22_27

Theory : rings_1


Home Index