Nuprl Lemma : rneq-if-rabs2

∀x,y:ℝ.  ((r0 < |x - y|) ⇒ x ≠ y)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rneq: x ≠ y,  rless: x < y,  rabs: |x|,  rsub: x - y,  int-to-real: r(n),  real: ℝ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  ge: i ≥ j ,  nat: ℕ,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bnot: ¬bb,  bfalse: ff,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  btrue: tt,  it: ⋅,  unit: Unit,  bool: 𝔹,  absval: |i|,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  rneq: x ≠ y,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  less_than: a < b,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  true: True,  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  and: P ∧ Q,  real: ℝ,  rminus: -(x),  rmax: rmax(x;y),  rsub: x - y,  has-value: (a)↓,  guard: {T},  sq_type: SQType(T),  prop: ℙ,  top: Top,  false: False,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  not: ¬A,  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  int-to-real: r(n),  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  rless: x < y,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :  int_formula_prop_or_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  intformor_wf,  intformle_wf,  multiply-is-int-iff,  nat_properties,  absval_wf,  absval_unfold2,  assert_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert-bnot,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  lt_int_wf,  remainder_wfa,  rem_bounds_absval,  div_rem_sum,  radd-approx,  false_wf,  int_term_value_minus_lemma,  itermMinus_wf,  minus-is-int-iff,  add-is-int-iff,  less_than_wf,  istype-top,  nequal_wf,  istype-less_than,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  intformless_wf,  intformand_wf,  decidable__lt,  divide_wfa,  imax_strict_ub,  rminus_wf,  rabs-as-rmax,  int-value-type,  value-type-has-value,  real_wf,  rsub_wf,  rabs_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  rless_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  istype-int,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  intformeq_wf,  intformnot_wf,  full-omega-unsat,  decidable__equal_int,  nat_plus_properties,  int_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq
Rules used in proof :  functionIsType,  inrFormation_alt,  inlFormation_alt,  equalityElimination,  unionIsType,  baseApply,  promote_hyp,  pointwiseFunctionality,  applyLambdaEquality,  inrEquality_alt,  inlEquality_alt,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  isectIsTypeImplies,  axiomSqEquality,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  lessCases,  productElimination,  sqequalBase,  baseClosed,  equalityIstype,  minusEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  closedConclusion,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  applyEquality,  addEquality,  multiplyEquality,  callbyvalueReduce,  inhabitedIsType,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  universeIsType,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  lambdaEquality_alt,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  independent_functionElimination,  approximateComputation,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  because_Cache,  dependent_functionElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  intEquality,  cumulativity,  isectElimination,  extract_by_obid,  introduction,  instantiate,  sqequalRule,  hypothesis,  cut,  rename,  thin,  setElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  lambdaFormation_alt,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution

Latex:
\mforall{}x,y:\mBbbR{}.    ((r0  <  |x  -  y|)  {}\mRightarrow{}  x  \mneq{}  y)



Date html generated: 2019_11_06-PM-00_27_38
Last ObjectModification: 2019_11_05-PM-02_11_50

Theory : reals


Home Index