Nuprl Lemma : gen-continuity-is-false

¬(∀P:(ℕ ⟶ ℕ) ⟶ ℙ. ∀f:ℕ ⟶ ℕ.  ((P f) ⇒ ⇃(∃k:ℕ. ∀g:ℕ ⟶ ℕ. ((f = g ∈ (ℕk ⟶ ℕ)) ⇒ (P g)))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  quotient: x,y:A//B[x; y],  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  prop: ℙ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  true: True,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  nat: ℕ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_apply: x[s],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  int_upper: {i...},  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  zero-seq: 0s,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  squash: ↓T,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q
Lemmas referenced :  all_wf,  nat_wf,  exists_wf,  int_upper_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  int_upper_subtype_nat,  zero-seq_wf,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  le_wf,  quotient_wf,  equal_wf,  int_seg_wf,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  true_wf,  equiv_rel_true,  squash-from-quotient,  equal-wf-base-T,  lt_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  less_than_wf,  int_seg_properties,  decidable__equal_int,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_upper_properties,  int_subtype_base,  bool_cases,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bnot
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  hypothesis,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  lambdaEquality,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  sqequalRule,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  intEquality,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  baseClosed,  because_Cache,  functionEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  unionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  universeEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  imageElimination,  productElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  promote_hyp,  impliesFunctionality

Latex:
\mneg{}(\mforall{}P:(\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{})  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbP{}.  \mforall{}f:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.    ((P  f)  {}\mRightarrow{}  \00D9(\mexists{}k:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}g:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.  ((f  =  g)  {}\mRightarrow{}  (P  g)))))



Date html generated: 2017_09_29-PM-06_10_10
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_11-PM-05_33_38

Theory : continuity


Home Index