Nuprl Lemma : flip_bijection

∀k:ℕ. ∀i,j:ℕk.  Bij(ℕk;ℕk;(i, j))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  flip: (i, j),  biject: Bij(A;B;f),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  biject: Bij(A;B;f),  surject: Surj(A;B;f),  inject: Inj(A;B;f),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  and: P ∧ Q,  cand: A c∧ B,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  int_seg: {i..j-},  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  nat: ℕ,  so_apply: x[s],  uimplies: b supposing a,  flip: (i, j),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  guard: {T},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  squash: ↓T,  true: True
Lemmas referenced :  flip_wf,  set_subtype_base,  lelt_wf,  istype-int,  int_subtype_base,  int_seg_wf,  nat_wf,  eq_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  int_seg_properties,  nat_properties,  decidable__equal_int,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  decidable__le,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  decidable__lt,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  le_wf,  less_than_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  iff_imp_equal_bool,  bfalse_wf,  iff_functionality_wrt_iff,  assert_wf,  equal-wf-base,  false_wf,  iff_weakening_uiff,  iff_weakening_equal,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  equal_wf,  istype-universe,  eq_int_eq_true,  btrue_wf,  ifthenelse_wf,  assert_elim,  bnot_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  btrue_neq_bfalse
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  sqequalReflexivity,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  Error :lambdaFormation_alt,  cut,  hypothesis,  Error :equalityIsType4,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  hypothesisEquality,  applyEquality,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  intEquality,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  Error :universeIsType,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  productElimination,  applyLambdaEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  Error :dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  Error :productIsType,  Error :equalityIsType2,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  Error :equalityIsType1,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  universeEquality,  Error :equalityIsType3

Latex:
\mforall{}k:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}i,j:\mBbbN{}k.    Bij(\mBbbN{}k;\mBbbN{}k;(i,  j))



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-01_36_05
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_05-PM-02_47_59

Theory : list_1


Home Index