Nuprl Lemma : ap2-tuple-as-tuple
∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[f,t:n-tuple(n)]. ∀[x:Top].  (ap2-tuple(n;f;x;t) ~ tuple(n;i.f.i x t.i))
Proof
Definitions occuring in Statement : 
select-tuple: x.n
, 
ap2-tuple: ap2-tuple(len;f;x;t)
, 
tuple: tuple(n;i.F[i])
, 
n-tuple: n-tuple(n)
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
top: Top
, 
apply: f a
, 
sqequal: s ~ t
Definitions unfolded in proof : 
uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
, 
member: t ∈ T
, 
nat: ℕ
, 
implies: P 
⇒ Q
, 
false: False
, 
ge: i ≥ j 
, 
uimplies: b supposing a
, 
satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla)
, 
exists: ∃x:A. B[x]
, 
not: ¬A
, 
all: ∀x:A. B[x]
, 
top: Top
, 
and: P ∧ Q
, 
prop: ℙ
, 
le: A ≤ B
, 
less_than': less_than'(a;b)
, 
so_lambda: λ2x.t[x]
, 
so_apply: x[s]
, 
ap2-tuple: ap2-tuple(len;f;x;t)
, 
eq_int: (i =z j)
, 
subtract: n - m
, 
ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi 
, 
btrue: tt
, 
sq_type: SQType(T)
, 
guard: {T}
, 
decidable: Dec(P)
, 
or: P ∨ Q
, 
bool: 𝔹
, 
unit: Unit
, 
it: ⋅
, 
uiff: uiff(P;Q)
, 
bfalse: ff
, 
bnot: ¬bb
, 
assert: ↑b
, 
select-tuple: x.n
, 
nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T 
, 
pi2: snd(t)
, 
tuple: tuple(n;i.F[i])
, 
subtype_rel: A ⊆r B
, 
cons: [a / b]
, 
colength: colength(L)
, 
so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y]
, 
so_apply: x[s1;s2]
, 
nil: []
, 
less_than: a < b
, 
squash: ↓T
, 
int_seg: {i..j-}
, 
pi1: fst(t)
, 
lelt: i ≤ j < k
Lemmas referenced : 
nat_properties, 
satisfiable-full-omega-tt, 
intformand_wf, 
intformle_wf, 
itermConstant_wf, 
itermVar_wf, 
intformless_wf, 
int_formula_prop_and_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_le_lemma, 
int_term_value_constant_lemma, 
int_term_value_var_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_less_lemma, 
int_formula_prop_wf, 
ge_wf, 
less_than_wf, 
top_wf, 
n-tuple_wf, 
n-tuple-decomp, 
false_wf, 
le_wf, 
tuple-decomp, 
subtype_base_sq, 
unit_wf2, 
unit_subtype_base, 
equal-unit, 
it_wf, 
decidable__le, 
subtract_wf, 
intformnot_wf, 
itermSubtract_wf, 
int_formula_prop_not_lemma, 
int_term_value_subtract_lemma, 
eq_int_wf, 
bool_wf, 
eqtt_to_assert, 
assert_of_eq_int, 
intformeq_wf, 
int_formula_prop_eq_lemma, 
eqff_to_assert, 
equal_wf, 
bool_cases_sqequal, 
bool_subtype_base, 
assert-bnot, 
neg_assert_of_eq_int, 
upto_wf, 
list_wf, 
int_seg_wf, 
equal-wf-T-base, 
nat_wf, 
colength_wf_list, 
less_than_transitivity1, 
less_than_irreflexivity, 
list-cases, 
map_nil_lemma, 
product_subtype_list, 
spread_cons_lemma, 
itermAdd_wf, 
int_term_value_add_lemma, 
set_subtype_base, 
int_subtype_base, 
decidable__equal_int, 
map_cons_lemma, 
int_seg_properties, 
add-subtract-cancel
Rules used in proof : 
sqequalSubstitution, 
sqequalTransitivity, 
computationStep, 
sqequalReflexivity, 
isect_memberFormation, 
introduction, 
cut, 
extract_by_obid, 
sqequalHypSubstitution, 
isectElimination, 
thin, 
hypothesisEquality, 
hypothesis, 
setElimination, 
rename, 
intWeakElimination, 
lambdaFormation, 
natural_numberEquality, 
independent_isectElimination, 
dependent_pairFormation, 
lambdaEquality, 
int_eqEquality, 
intEquality, 
dependent_functionElimination, 
isect_memberEquality, 
voidElimination, 
voidEquality, 
sqequalRule, 
independent_pairFormation, 
computeAll, 
independent_functionElimination, 
sqequalAxiom, 
dependent_set_memberEquality, 
because_Cache, 
instantiate, 
cumulativity, 
equalityTransitivity, 
equalitySymmetry, 
unionElimination, 
equalityElimination, 
productElimination, 
promote_hyp, 
applyEquality, 
hypothesis_subsumption, 
applyLambdaEquality, 
addEquality, 
baseClosed, 
imageElimination
Latex:
\mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[f,t:n-tuple(n)].  \mforall{}[x:Top].    (ap2-tuple(n;f;x;t)  \msim{}  tuple(n;i.f.i  x  t.i))
Date html generated:
2017_04_17-AM-09_29_47
Last ObjectModification:
2017_02_27-PM-05_31_03
Theory : tuples
Home
Index