Nuprl Lemma : bag-maximal?-iff

∀[T:Type]. ∀[b:bag(T)]. ∀[R:T ⟶ T ⟶ 𝔹]. ∀[x:T].  uiff(↑bag-maximal?(b;x;R);∀y:T. (y ↓∈ b ⇒ (↑(R x y))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bag-member: x ↓∈ bs,  bag-maximal?: bag-maximal?(bg;x;R),  bag: bag(T),  assert: ↑b,  bool: 𝔹,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  nat: ℕ,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  guard: {T},  or: P ∨ Q,  bag-maximal?: bag-maximal?(bg;x;R),  bag-accum: bag-accum(v,x.f[v; x];init;bs),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  cons: [a / b],  colength: colength(L),  decidable: Dec(P),  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  sq_type: SQType(T),  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  band: p ∧b q,  true: True,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  cons-bag: x.b,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  cand: A c∧ B,  sq_or: a ↓∨ b
Lemmas referenced :  bag-maximal?-max,  bag-member_wf,  assert_witness,  assert_wf,  bag-maximal?_wf,  all_wf,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  list-subtype-bag,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  equal-wf-T-base,  nat_wf,  colength_wf_list,  less_than_transitivity1,  less_than_irreflexivity,  list_wf,  list-cases,  list_accum_nil_lemma,  true_wf,  nil_wf,  product_subtype_list,  spread_cons_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  decidable__le,  intformnot_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  le_wf,  equal_wf,  subtract_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  subtype_base_sq,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  decidable__equal_int,  list_accum_cons_lemma,  list_accum_wf,  bool_wf,  band_wf,  cons_wf,  member_wf,  btrue_wf,  list_induction,  bag_wf,  bag_to_squash_list,  sq_stable_from_decidable,  decidable__assert,  bag-maximal?-cons,  bag-member-cons
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  independent_pairFormation,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  lambdaFormation,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  because_Cache,  hypothesisEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  hypothesis,  cumulativity,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  functionExtensionality,  applyEquality,  functionEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  applyLambdaEquality,  unionElimination,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  productElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  addEquality,  baseClosed,  instantiate,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  independent_pairEquality,  hyp_replacement,  imageMemberEquality,  inrFormation,  inlFormation

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[b:bag(T)].  \mforall{}[R:T  {}\mrightarrow{}  T  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}].  \mforall{}[x:T].
    uiff(\muparrow{}bag-maximal?(b;x;R);\mforall{}y:T.  (y  \mdownarrow{}\mmember{}  b  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\muparrow{}(R  x  y))))



Date html generated: 2017_10_01-AM-08_58_57
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-04_40_49

Theory : bags


Home Index