Nuprl Lemma : combinations-split

∀[m,n,k:ℕ].  C(n + k;m) = (C(k;m) * C(n;m - k)) ∈ ℤ supposing (n + k) ≤ m


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  combinations: C(n;m),  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  le: A ≤ B,  multiply: n * m,  subtract: n - m,  add: n + m,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  nat: ℕ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  ge: i ≥ j ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  le: A ≤ B,  btrue: tt,  eq_int: (i =z j),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  combinations_aux: combinations_aux(b;n;m),  combinations: C(n;m),  guard: {T},  sq_type: SQType(T),  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  int_upper: {i...},  subtract: n - m
Lemmas referenced :  nat_properties,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  istype-void,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  ge_wf,  istype-less_than,  le_wf,  nat_wf,  subtract-1-ge-0,  subtract_wf,  false_wf,  combinations_wf_int,  decidable__le,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  intformeq_wf,  intformnot_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  decidable__equal_int,  int_subtype_base,  set_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  combinations-step,  eq_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_wf,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  upper_subtype_nat,  istype-false,  nequal-le-implies,  zero-add,  add-commutes,  int_upper_properties,  add-associates,  minus-zero,  one-mul,  add-zero,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  itermMultiply_wf,  minus-add,  minus-minus,  minus-one-mul,  add-swap,  mul-associates
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  lambdaFormation_alt,  natural_numberEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  approximateComputation,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  lambdaEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  voidElimination,  sqequalRule,  independent_pairFormation,  universeIsType,  axiomEquality,  isectIsTypeImplies,  inhabitedIsType,  functionIsTypeImplies,  addEquality,  because_Cache,  productElimination,  lambdaFormation,  multiplyEquality,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  computeAll,  voidEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  unionElimination,  lambdaEquality,  intEquality,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  equalityElimination,  equalityIsType4,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  applyEquality,  promote_hyp,  equalityIsType1,  hypothesis_subsumption,  minusEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[m,n,k:\mBbbN{}].    C(n  +  k;m)  =  (C(k;m)  *  C(n;m  -  k))  supposing  (n  +  k)  \mleq{}  m



Date html generated: 2019_10_15-AM-11_16_19
Last ObjectModification: 2018_10_16-PM-03_13_36

Theory : general


Home Index