Nuprl Lemma : very-dep-fun-eta

∀[A,B:Type]. ∀[C:A ⟶ B ⟶ Type]. ∀[f:very-dep-fun(A;B;a,b.C[a;b])].  (f = (λL,b. (f L b)) ∈ very-dep-fun(A;B;a,b.C[a;b]\000C))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  very-dep-fun: very-dep-fun(A;B;a,b.C[a; b]),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  apply: f a,  lambda: λx.A[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  very-dep-fun: very-dep-fun(A;B;a,b.C[a; b]),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  nat: ℕ,  vdf: vdf(A;B;a,b.C[a; b];n),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  not: ¬A,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  prop: ℙ,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  ge: i ≥ j ,  lt_int: i <z j,  subtract: n - m
Lemmas referenced :  decidable__le,  istype-le,  lt_int_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_wf,  less_than_wf,  istype-less_than,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  eta_conv,  list_wf,  length_wf_nat,  set_subtype_base,  le_wf,  int_subtype_base,  very-dep-fun_wf,  istype-universe,  nat_properties,  ge_wf,  subtract-1-ge-0,  istype-nat,  equal-wf-base,  le_int_wf,  bnot_wf,  uiff_transitivity,  assert_functionality_wrt_uiff,  bnot_of_lt_int,  assert_of_le_int,  not_wf,  istype-assert,  istype-void,  bool_cases,  iff_transitivity,  assert_of_bnot,  length_wf,  vdf-eq_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  extract_by_obid,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  natural_numberEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  unionElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  isectElimination,  because_Cache,  sqequalRule,  inhabitedIsType,  lambdaFormation_alt,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  equalityIstype,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  independent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  approximateComputation,  lambdaEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  Error :memTop,  independent_pairFormation,  universeIsType,  functionExtensionality_alt,  applyEquality,  setIsType,  productEquality,  intEquality,  baseClosed,  sqequalBase,  axiomEquality,  isectIsTypeImplies,  functionIsType,  universeEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  intWeakElimination,  functionIsTypeImplies,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  dependentIntersection_memberEquality,  dependentIntersectionEqElimination,  functionExtensionality,  setEquality,  applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[A,B:Type].  \mforall{}[C:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  B  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type].  \mforall{}[f:very-dep-fun(A;B;a,b.C[a;b])].    (f  =  (\mlambda{}L,b.  (f  L  b)))



Date html generated: 2020_05_19-PM-09_40_33
Last ObjectModification: 2020_03_10-PM-00_32_13

Theory : co-recursion-2


Home Index