Nuprl Lemma : assert-bag-has-no-repeats

∀[T:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(T)]. ∀[b:bag(T)].  (↑bag-has-no-repeats(eq;b) ⇐⇒ bag-no-repeats(T;b))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  bag-has-no-repeats: bag-has-no-repeats(eq;b),  bag-no-repeats: bag-no-repeats(T;bs),  bag: bag(T),  deq: EqDecider(T),  assert: ↑b,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  universe: Type
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  bag-has-no-repeats: bag-has-no-repeats(eq;b),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  member: t ∈ T,  bag-no-repeats: bag-no-repeats(T;bs),  squash: ↓T,  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  nat: ℕ,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  true: True,  guard: {T},  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  less_than: a < b,  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  top: Top,  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  ge: i ≥ j ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q)
Lemmas referenced :  equal_wf,  bag-size_wf,  bag-remove-repeats_wf,  nat_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  bag_wf,  bag-remove-repeats-if-no-repeats,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal,  bag-no-repeats_wf,  assert_of_eq_int,  assert_wf,  eq_int_wf,  iff_wf,  deq_wf,  bag-remove-repeats-no-repeats,  sub-bag_antisymmetry,  sub-bag-iff,  count-bag-remove-repeats,  lt_int_wf,  bag-count_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  less_than_wf,  nat_properties,  bag-size-partition,  int_subtype_base,  bag-size-as-summation,  bag-summation-equal-implies-all-equal-1,  bag-member_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  bag-count-member,  bag-member-remove-repeats
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  cut,  independent_pairFormation,  lambdaFormation,  introduction,  sqequalRule,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  imageElimination,  hypothesis,  imageMemberEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  thin,  baseClosed,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  intEquality,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  instantiate,  productElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  addLevel,  universeEquality,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  promote_hyp,  cumulativity

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(T)].  \mforall{}[b:bag(T)].    (\muparrow{}bag-has-no-repeats(eq;b)  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  bag-no-repeats(T;b))



Date html generated: 2019_10_16-AM-11_32_54
Last ObjectModification: 2018_08_25-AM-11_18_22

Theory : bags_2


Home Index