Nuprl Lemma : ws-constant

[a:ℚ]. ∀[p:FinProbSpace]. ∀[F:Outcome ⟶ ℚ].  weighted-sum(p;F) a ∈ ℚ supposing ∀x:Outcome. ((F x) a ∈ ℚ)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  weighted-sum: weighted-sum(p;F) p-outcome: Outcome finite-prob-space: FinProbSpace rationals: uimplies: supposing a uall: [x:A]. B[x] all: x:A. B[x] apply: a function: x:A ⟶ B[x] equal: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  weighted-sum: weighted-sum(p;F) p-outcome: Outcome finite-prob-space: FinProbSpace uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T uimplies: supposing a prop: so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] and: P ∧ Q guard: {T} int_seg: {i..j-} lelt: i ≤ j < k all: x:A. B[x] decidable: Dec(P) or: P ∨ Q satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) exists: x:A. B[x] false: False implies:  Q not: ¬A top: Top less_than: a < b squash: T subtype_rel: A ⊆B true: True iff: ⇐⇒ Q rev_implies:  Q select: L[n] nil: [] it: so_lambda: λ2y.t[x; y] so_apply: x[s1;s2] uiff: uiff(P;Q) qeq: qeq(r;s) callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall evalall: evalall(t) qsum: Σa ≤ j < b. E[j] rng_sum: rng_sum mon_itop: Π lb ≤ i < ub. E[i] itop: Π(op,id) lb ≤ i < ub. E[i] ycomb: Y ifthenelse: if then else fi  lt_int: i <j bfalse: ff grp_id: e pi1: fst(t) pi2: snd(t) add_grp_of_rng: r↓+gp rng_zero: 0 qrng: <ℚ+*> btrue: tt eq_int: (i =z j) assert: b cons: [a b] nat: le: A ≤ B cand: c∧ B subtract: m less_than': less_than'(a;b)
Lemmas referenced :  all_wf int_seg_wf length_wf rationals_wf equal_wf set_wf list_wf equal-wf-T-base qsum_wf select_wf int_seg_properties decidable__le satisfiable-full-omega-tt intformand_wf intformnot_wf intformle_wf itermConstant_wf itermVar_wf int_formula_prop_and_lemma int_formula_prop_not_lemma int_formula_prop_le_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma int_term_value_var_lemma int_formula_prop_wf decidable__lt intformless_wf int_formula_prop_less_lemma l_all_wf2 l_member_wf qle_wf int-subtype-rationals squash_wf true_wf qmul_wf iff_weakening_equal prod_sum_l_q le_weakening2 list-cases length_of_nil_lemma stuck-spread base_wf assert-qeq product_subtype_list length_of_cons_lemma length_wf_nat nat_wf false_wf not-lt-2 condition-implies-le minus-add minus-one-mul zero-add minus-one-mul-top add-commutes add_functionality_wrt_le add-associates add-zero le-add-cancel qmul_one_qrng
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalRule sqequalReflexivity sqequalTransitivity computationStep isect_memberFormation introduction cut hypothesis extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination thin natural_numberEquality setElimination rename hypothesisEquality lambdaEquality applyEquality functionExtensionality because_Cache isect_memberEquality axiomEquality equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry functionEquality productEquality independent_isectElimination productElimination dependent_functionElimination unionElimination dependent_pairFormation int_eqEquality intEquality voidElimination voidEquality independent_pairFormation computeAll imageElimination baseClosed lambdaFormation setEquality universeEquality imageMemberEquality independent_functionElimination promote_hyp hypothesis_subsumption addEquality minusEquality hyp_replacement applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[a:\mBbbQ{}].  \mforall{}[p:FinProbSpace].  \mforall{}[F:Outcome  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbQ{}].
    weighted-sum(p;F)  =  a  supposing  \mforall{}x:Outcome.  ((F  x)  =  a)



Date html generated: 2018_05_22-AM-00_34_31
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_59_49

Theory : randomness


Home Index