Nuprl Lemma : ws-constant

∀[a:ℚ]. ∀[p:FinProbSpace]. ∀[F:Outcome ⟶ ℚ].  weighted-sum(p;F) = a ∈ ℚ supposing ∀x:Outcome. ((F x) = a ∈ ℚ)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  weighted-sum: weighted-sum(p;F),  p-outcome: Outcome,  finite-prob-space: FinProbSpace,  rationals: ℚ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  weighted-sum: weighted-sum(p;F),  p-outcome: Outcome,  finite-prob-space: FinProbSpace,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  and: P ∧ Q,  guard: {T},  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  select: L[n],  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  qeq: qeq(r;s),  callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall,  evalall: evalall(t),  qsum: Σa ≤ j < b. E[j],  rng_sum: rng_sum,  mon_itop: Π lb ≤ i < ub. E[i],  itop: Π(op,id) lb ≤ i < ub. E[i],  ycomb: Y,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  lt_int: i <z j,  bfalse: ff,  grp_id: e,  pi1: fst(t),  pi2: snd(t),  add_grp_of_rng: r↓+gp,  rng_zero: 0,  qrng: <ℚ+*>,  btrue: tt,  eq_int: (i =z j),  assert: ↑b,  cons: [a / b],  nat: ℕ,  le: A ≤ B,  cand: A c∧ B,  subtract: n - m,  less_than': less_than'(a;b)
Lemmas referenced :  all_wf,  int_seg_wf,  length_wf,  rationals_wf,  equal_wf,  set_wf,  list_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  qsum_wf,  select_wf,  int_seg_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  decidable__lt,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  l_all_wf2,  l_member_wf,  qle_wf,  int-subtype-rationals,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  qmul_wf,  iff_weakening_equal,  prod_sum_l_q,  le_weakening2,  list-cases,  length_of_nil_lemma,  stuck-spread,  base_wf,  assert-qeq,  product_subtype_list,  length_of_cons_lemma,  length_wf_nat,  nat_wf,  false_wf,  not-lt-2,  condition-implies-le,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  zero-add,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-commutes,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-associates,  add-zero,  le-add-cancel,  qmul_one_qrng
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalRule,  sqequalReflexivity,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  hypothesis,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  natural_numberEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  lambdaEquality,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  because_Cache,  isect_memberEquality,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  functionEquality,  productEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  productElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  imageElimination,  baseClosed,  lambdaFormation,  setEquality,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  addEquality,  minusEquality,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[a:\mBbbQ{}].  \mforall{}[p:FinProbSpace].  \mforall{}[F:Outcome  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbQ{}].
    weighted-sum(p;F)  =  a  supposing  \mforall{}x:Outcome.  ((F  x)  =  a)



Date html generated: 2018_05_22-AM-00_34_31
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_59_49

Theory : randomness


Home Index