Nuprl Lemma : approximate-qsqrt

∀a:{a:ℚ| 0 ≤ a} . ∀n:ℕ+.  (∃q:ℚ [((0 ≤ q) ∧ |(q * q) - a| < (1/n))])


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  qabs: |r|,  qle: r ≤ s,  qless: r < s,  qsub: r - s,  qdiv: (r/s),  qmul: r * s,  rationals: ℚ,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  and: P ∧ Q,  set: {x:A| B[x]} ,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  squash: ↓T,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  nat_plus: ℕ+,  cand: A c∧ B,  not: ¬A,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  uimplies: b supposing a,  sq_exists: ∃x:A [B[x]],  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  false: False,  true: True,  guard: {T},  nat: ℕ,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  qsub: r - s
Lemmas referenced :  sq_stable_from_decidable,  qle_wf,  int-subtype-rationals,  decidable__qle,  better-q-elim,  nat_plus_properties,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_wf,  qeq_wf2,  equal-wf-base,  rationals_wf,  int_subtype_base,  assert-qeq,  istype-assert,  sq_exists_wf,  qless_wf,  qabs_wf,  qsub_wf,  qmul_wf,  qdiv_wf,  subtype_rel_set,  less_than_wf,  int_nzero-rational,  nat_plus_inc_int_nzero,  nat_plus_wf,  qmul_preserves_qle2,  qle-int,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  qle_witness,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  qmul_zero_qrng,  subtype_rel_self,  qmul-qdiv-cancel,  iff_weakening_equal,  square-between-lemma3,  istype-le,  decidable__lt,  istype-less_than,  qabs-as-qmax,  qmax_strict_lb,  qadd_preserves_qless,  qadd_wf,  qadd_com,  qadd_comm_q,  qadd_inv_assoc_q,  qmul_over_plus_qrng,  qinv_inv_q,  mon_assoc_q,  qadd_ac_1_q,  qinverse_q,  mon_ident_q
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation_alt,  setElimination,  thin,  rename,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  because_Cache,  applyEquality,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  hypothesisEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  imageElimination,  productElimination,  universeIsType,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  functionEquality,  lambdaEquality_alt,  productEquality,  closedConclusion,  natural_numberEquality,  intEquality,  inhabitedIsType,  independent_isectElimination,  setIsType,  unionElimination,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  int_eqEquality,  Error :memTop,  independent_pairFormation,  voidElimination,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  instantiate,  universeEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  productIsType,  minusEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}a:\{a:\mBbbQ{}|  0  \mleq{}  a\}  .  \mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}.    (\mexists{}q:\mBbbQ{}  [((0  \mleq{}  q)  \mwedge{}  |(q  *  q)  -  a|  <  (1/n))])



Date html generated: 2020_05_20-AM-09_30_52
Last ObjectModification: 2019_12_31-PM-04_59_54

Theory : rationals


Home Index