Nuprl Lemma : q-max-exists

∀as:ℚ List. ∃a:ℚ. ((a ∈ as) supposing ¬↑null(as) ∧ (∀a'∈as.a' ≤ a))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  qle: r ≤ s,  rationals: ℚ,  l_all: (∀x∈L.P[x]),  l_member: (x ∈ l),  null: null(as),  list: T List,  assert: ↑b,  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  and: P ∧ Q
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  assert: ↑b,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  cons: [a / b],  top: Top,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  and: P ∧ Q,  cand: A c∧ B,  uimplies: b supposing a,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  prop: ℙ,  true: True,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  le: A ≤ B,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  guard: {T},  nat: ℕ,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  subtract: n - m,  less_than': less_than'(a;b)
Lemmas referenced :  rationals_wf,  list-cases,  null_nil_lemma,  product_subtype_list,  null_cons_lemma,  list_wf,  int-subtype-rationals,  true_wf,  not_wf,  l_all_nil,  l_member_wf,  nil_wf,  l_all_wf2,  qle_wf,  subtype_rel_set,  qmax-list_wf,  cons_wf,  length_of_cons_lemma,  non_neg_length,  decidable__lt,  length_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  false_wf,  qmax-list-member,  qmax-list-bounds,  length_of_nil_lemma,  nil_member,  btrue_wf,  and_wf,  equal_wf,  null_wf3,  subtype_rel_list,  top_wf,  member-implies-null-eq-bfalse,  btrue_neq_bfalse,  length_wf_nat,  nat_wf,  not-lt-2,  condition-implies-le,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  zero-add,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-commutes,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-associates,  add-zero,  le-add-cancel,  cons_neq_nil,  qle_reflexivity
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  hypothesis,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  dependent_functionElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  unionElimination,  sqequalRule,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  productElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  natural_numberEquality,  applyEquality,  isect_memberFormation,  lambdaEquality,  rename,  independent_functionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  productEquality,  isectEquality,  functionExtensionality,  independent_isectElimination,  setEquality,  addEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  computeAll,  because_Cache,  setElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  minusEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}as:\mBbbQ{}  List.  \mexists{}a:\mBbbQ{}.  ((a  \mmember{}  as)  supposing  \mneg{}\muparrow{}null(as)  \mwedge{}  (\mforall{}a'\mmember{}as.a'  \mleq{}  a))



Date html generated: 2018_05_22-AM-00_17_15
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_53_15

Theory : rationals


Home Index