Nuprl Lemma : int-ring-hom-p-adic-ring

∀[p:{2...}]. (λk.k(p) ∈ RingHom(ℤ-rng;ℤ(p)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  p-adic-ring: ℤ(p),  p-int: k(p),  int_ring: ℤ-rng,  ring_hom: RingHom(R;S),  int_upper: {i...},  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  lambda: λx.A[x],  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  ring_hom: RingHom(R;S),  nat_plus: ℕ+,  int_upper: {i...},  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  prop: ℙ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uimplies: b supposing a,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  top: Top,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  true: True,  int_ring: ℤ-rng,  rng_car: |r|,  pi1: fst(t),  p-adics: p-adics(p),  p-adic-ring: ℤ(p),  guard: {T},  integ_dom: IntegDom{i},  crng: CRng,  rng: Rng,  cand: A c∧ B,  rng_plus: +r,  pi2: snd(t),  fun_thru_2op: FunThru2op(A;B;opa;opb;f),  infix_ap: x f y,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  subtract: n - m,  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  so_apply: x[s],  rng_times: *,  rng_one: 1
Lemmas referenced :  p-int_wf,  decidable__lt,  false_wf,  not-lt-2,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-commutes,  zero-add,  le-add-cancel,  less_than_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  rng_car_wf,  p-adic-ring_wf,  rng_subtype_rng_sig,  crng_subtype_rng,  subtype_rel_transitivity,  crng_wf,  rng_wf,  rng_sig_wf,  int_ring_wf,  integ_dom_wf,  p-adic-property,  nat_plus_properties,  int_upper_properties,  decidable__le,  full-omega-unsat,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  le_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  p-add-int,  all_wf,  eqmod_wf,  exp_wf2,  nat_plus_subtype_nat,  less-iff-le,  condition-implies-le,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-associates,  add-zero,  int_seg_wf,  int_seg_properties,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  p-mul-int,  fun_thru_2op_wf,  rng_plus_wf,  rng_times_wf,  equal_wf,  rng_one_wf,  int_upper_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  lambdaEquality,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  productElimination,  dependent_functionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  lambdaFormation,  voidElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  sqequalRule,  applyEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  intEquality,  instantiate,  because_Cache,  addEquality,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  equalitySymmetry,  minusEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  applyLambdaEquality,  axiomEquality,  multiplyEquality,  productEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[p:\{2...\}].  (\mlambda{}k.k(p)  \mmember{}  RingHom(\mBbbZ{}-rng;\mBbbZ{}(p)))



Date html generated: 2019_10_15-AM-10_35_12
Last ObjectModification: 2018_08_22-AM-09_39_22

Theory : rings_1


Home Index