Nuprl Lemma : proj-sep-implies

n:ℕ. ∀a,b:ℙ^n.  (a ≠  (∃i,j:ℕ1. (a i) (b j) ≠ (a j) (b i)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  proj-sep: a ≠ b real-proj: ^n rneq: x ≠ y rmul: b int_seg: {i..j-} nat: all: x:A. B[x] exists: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q apply: a add: m natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: x:A. B[x] implies:  Q member: t ∈ T nat: uall: [x:A]. B[x] ge: i ≥  decidable: Dec(P) or: P ∨ Q uimplies: supposing a not: ¬A satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) exists: x:A. B[x] false: False top: Top and: P ∧ Q prop: real-proj: ^n iff: ⇐⇒ Q rev_implies:  Q proj-sep: a ≠ b real-vec-sep: a ≠ b rless: x < y sq_exists: x:{A| B[x]} subtype_rel: A ⊆B real: nat_plus: + sq_stable: SqStable(P) squash: T rneq: x ≠ y guard: {T} real-vec: ^n int_seg: {i..j-} lelt: i ≤ j < k so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] punit: u(a) real-vec-mul: a*X uiff: uiff(P;Q) rdiv: (x/y) req_int_terms: t1 ≡ t2
Lemmas referenced :  Cauchy-Schwarz-strict nat_properties decidable__le full-omega-unsat intformand_wf intformnot_wf intformle_wf itermConstant_wf itermAdd_wf itermVar_wf int_formula_prop_and_lemma int_formula_prop_not_lemma int_formula_prop_le_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma int_term_value_add_lemma int_term_value_var_lemma int_formula_prop_wf le_wf Cauchy-Schwarz-non-equality proj-norm-positive real-vec-sep-iff-rneq sq_stable__less_than int-to-real_wf real_wf real-vec-dist_wf nat_plus_properties punit_wf real-vec-mul_wf rdiv_wf real-vec-norm_wf rless_wf rneq_wf int_seg_properties intformless_wf int_formula_prop_less_lemma real-vec_wf rminus_wf rneq-symmetry rmul_wf exists_wf int_seg_wf proj-sep_wf real-proj_wf nat_wf rmul_preserves_rneq rinv_wf2 itermSubtract_wf itermMultiply_wf req-iff-rsub-is-0 rmul-one rneq_functionality req_transitivity rmul_functionality req_weakening rmul-rinv real_polynomial_null real_term_value_sub_lemma real_term_value_mul_lemma real_term_value_var_lemma real_term_value_const_lemma itermMinus_wf real_term_value_minus_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity lambdaFormation cut introduction extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution dependent_functionElimination thin dependent_set_memberEquality addEquality setElimination rename hypothesisEquality hypothesis natural_numberEquality isectElimination unionElimination independent_isectElimination approximateComputation independent_functionElimination dependent_pairFormation lambdaEquality int_eqEquality intEquality isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality sqequalRule independent_pairFormation productElimination because_Cache applyEquality imageMemberEquality baseClosed imageElimination minusEquality inrFormation promote_hyp addLevel levelHypothesis

Latex:
\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}a,b:\mBbbP{}\^{}n.    (a  \mneq{}  b  {}\mRightarrow{}  (\mexists{}i,j:\mBbbN{}n  +  1.  (a  i)  *  (b  j)  \mneq{}  (a  j)  *  (b  i)))



Date html generated: 2017_10_05-AM-00_19_14
Last ObjectModification: 2017_06_20-PM-02_13_35

Theory : inner!product!spaces


Home Index