Nuprl Lemma : weak-continuity-implies-strong1

(∀F:(ℕ ⟶ ℕ) ⟶ ℕ. ⇃(∃M:(ℕ ⟶ ℕ) ⟶ ℕ. ∀f,g:ℕ ⟶ ℕ.  ((f = g ∈ (ℕM f ⟶ ℕ)) ⇒ ((F f) = (F g) ∈ ℕ))))
⇒ (∀F:(ℕ ⟶ ℕ) ⟶ ℕ
      ⇃(∃M:n:ℕ ⟶ (ℕn ⟶ ℕ) ⟶ (ℕ?)
         ∀f:ℕ ⟶ ℕ
           ((∃n:ℕ. ((M n f) = (inl (F f)) ∈ (ℕ?))) ∧ (∀n:ℕ. (M n f) = (inl (F f)) ∈ (ℕ?) supposing ↑isl(M n f)))))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  quotient: x,y:A//B[x; y],  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat: ℕ,  assert: ↑b,  isl: isl(x),  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  true: True,  unit: Unit,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  inl: inl x,  union: left + right,  natural_number: $n,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  implies: P ⇒ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  prop: ℙ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  nat: ℕ,  so_apply: x[s],  uimplies: b supposing a,  le: A ≤ B,  and: P ∧ Q,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  false: False,  not: ¬A,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  exposed-it: exposed-it,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  bfalse: ff,  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  top: Top,  ext2Baire: ext2Baire(n;f;d),  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  less_than: a < b,  squash: ↓T,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  isl: isl(x),  true: True,  cand: A c∧ B,  quotient: x,y:A//B[x; y]
Lemmas referenced :  nat_wf,  all_wf,  quotient_wf,  exists_wf,  equal_wf,  int_seg_wf,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  int_seg_subtype_nat,  false_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  true_wf,  equiv_rel_true,  implies-prop-truncation,  unit_wf2,  isect_wf,  assert_wf,  isl_wf,  le_int_wf,  ext2Baire_wf,  le_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_le_int,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  imax_wf,  imax_nat,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  lt_int_wf,  assert_of_lt_int,  less_than_wf,  int_seg_properties,  decidable__lt,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  imax_strict_ub,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  imax_ub,  decidable__equal_int,  prop-truncation-quot,  quotient-member-eq,  equal-wf-base,  member_wf,  squash_wf
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  rename,  cut,  hypothesis,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  functionEquality,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  because_Cache,  natural_numberEquality,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  setElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  productElimination,  comment,  unionEquality,  productEquality,  inlEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  voidElimination,  inrEquality,  axiomEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidEquality,  computeAll,  imageElimination,  inlFormation,  inrFormation,  isect_memberFormation,  pointwiseFunctionality,  pertypeElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed

Latex:
(\mforall{}F:(\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{})  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.  \00D9(\mexists{}M:(\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{})  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}f,g:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}.    ((f  =  g)  {}\mRightarrow{}  ((F  f)  =  (F  g)))))
{}\mRightarrow{}  (\mforall{}F:(\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{})  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}
            \00D9(\mexists{}M:n:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  (\mBbbN{}n  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{})  {}\mrightarrow{}  (\mBbbN{}?)
                  \mforall{}f:\mBbbN{}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbN{}
                      ((\mexists{}n:\mBbbN{}.  ((M  n  f)  =  (inl  (F  f))))  \mwedge{}  (\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  (M  n  f)  =  (inl  (F  f))  supposing  \muparrow{}isl(M  n  f)))))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-09_59_59
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_55_15

Theory : continuity


Home Index