Nuprl Lemma : from-upto-singleton

∀[n,m,k:ℤ].  uiff([n, m) = [k] ∈ (ℤ List);(m = (n + 1) ∈ ℤ) ∧ (k = n ∈ ℤ))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  from-upto: [n, m),  cons: [a / b],  nil: [],  list: T List,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  and: P ∧ Q,  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  and: P ∧ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  from-upto: [n, m),  has-value: (a)↓,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  bfalse: ff,  squash: ↓T,  ge: i ≥ j ,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b
Lemmas referenced :  equal-wf-base,  list_wf,  int_subtype_base,  lt_int_wf,  value-type-has-value,  int-value-type,  null_nil_lemma,  btrue_wf,  reduce_tl_cons_lemma,  nil_wf,  and_wf,  equal_wf,  tl_wf,  cons_wf,  from-upto_wf,  subtype_rel_list,  le_wf,  less_than_wf,  null_wf,  null_cons_lemma,  bfalse_wf,  btrue_neq_bfalse,  assert_wf,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  bool_cases,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqff_to_assert,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_bnot,  reduce_hd_cons_lemma,  hd_wf,  squash_wf,  ge_wf,  length_wf,  length_cons_ge_one,  top_wf,  from-upto-nil,  decidable__le,  intformle_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  bool_cases_sqequal,  assert-bnot
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  independent_pairFormation,  hypothesis,  sqequalRule,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  productElimination,  thin,  independent_pairEquality,  axiomEquality,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  intEquality,  baseApply,  closedConclusion,  baseClosed,  hypothesisEquality,  applyEquality,  because_Cache,  productEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  callbyvalueReduce,  independent_isectElimination,  addEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  applyLambdaEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  setEquality,  lambdaEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  computeAll,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  lambdaFormation,  impliesFunctionality,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  imageMemberEquality,  equalityElimination,  promote_hyp

Latex:
\mforall{}[n,m,k:\mBbbZ{}].    uiff([n,  m)  =  [k];(m  =  (n  +  1))  \mwedge{}  (k  =  n))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-07_56_04
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-04_28_26

Theory : list_1


Home Index