Nuprl Lemma : fpf-vals-nil

∀[A:Type]. ∀[eq:EqDecider(A)]. ∀[B:A ⟶ Type]. ∀[P:A ⟶ 𝔹]. ∀[f:x:A fp-> B[x]]. ∀[a:A].
  (fpf-vals(eq;P;f) ~ []) supposing ((∀b:A. (↑(P b) ⇐⇒ b = a ∈ A)) and (¬↑a ∈ dom(f)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  fpf-vals: fpf-vals(eq;P;f),  fpf-dom: x ∈ dom(f),  fpf: a:A fp-> B[a],  nil: [],  deq: EqDecider(T),  assert: ↑b,  bool: 𝔹,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  apply: f a,  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  universe: Type,  sqequal: s ~ t,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  fpf-vals: fpf-vals(eq;P;f),  let: let,  fpf: a:A fp-> B[a],  pi1: fst(t),  pi2: snd(t),  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  uimplies: b supposing a,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  top: Top,  prop: ℙ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  and: P ∧ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  fpf-dom: x ∈ dom(f),  cons: [a / b]
Lemmas referenced :  all_wf,  iff_wf,  assert_wf,  equal_wf,  not_wf,  fpf-dom_wf,  subtype-fpf2,  top_wf,  fpf_wf,  bool_wf,  deq_wf,  deq-member_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  l_member_wf,  bnot_wf,  cons_wf,  nil_wf,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert-deq-member,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_bnot,  list_wf,  nil_member,  false_wf,  filter_nil_lemma,  no_repeats_wf,  cons_member,  filter_cons_lemma,  no_repeats_cons,  uiff_transitivity,  or_wf,  list_induction,  filter_wf5,  subtype_rel_dep_function,  subtype_rel_self,  set_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  and_wf,  remove-repeats_wf,  remove-repeats-no_repeats,  remove-repeats_property,  zip_nil_lemma,  list-cases,  equal-wf-base,  product_subtype_list,  null_nil_lemma,  btrue_wf,  null_wf3,  subtype_rel_list,  null_cons_lemma,  bfalse_wf,  btrue_neq_bfalse
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  productElimination,  thin,  sqequalRule,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  hypothesisEquality,  lambdaEquality,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  hypothesis,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  lambdaFormation,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  functionEquality,  universeEquality,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalAxiom,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  baseClosed,  unionElimination,  equalityElimination,  independent_functionElimination,  independent_pairFormation,  dependent_functionElimination,  impliesFunctionality,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  promote_hyp,  setEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  dependent_pairFormation,  instantiate,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  inrFormation,  inlFormation,  hypothesis_subsumption

Latex:
\mforall{}[A:Type].  \mforall{}[eq:EqDecider(A)].  \mforall{}[B:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  Type].  \mforall{}[P:A  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbB{}].  \mforall{}[f:x:A  fp->  B[x]].  \mforall{}[a:A].
    (fpf-vals(eq;P;f)  \msim{}  [])  supposing  ((\mforall{}b:A.  (\muparrow{}(P  b)  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  b  =  a))  and  (\mneg{}\muparrow{}a  \mmember{}  dom(f)))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-09_26_18
Last ObjectModification: 2018_02_09-AM-10_21_46

Theory : finite!partial!functions


Home Index