Nuprl Lemma : strong-subtype-equal-lists

∀[A,B:Type].  ∀[L1:A List]. ∀[L2:B List].  L1 = L2 ∈ (A List) supposing L1 = L2 ∈ (B List) supposing strong-subtype(A;B)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  list: T List,  strong-subtype: strong-subtype(A;B),  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  universe: Type,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  uimplies: b supposing a,  member: t ∈ T,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  guard: {T},  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  cand: A c∧ B,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  strong-subtype: strong-subtype(A;B),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  cons: [a / b],  colength: colength(L),  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  nil: [],  it: ⋅,  sq_type: SQType(T),  less_than: a < b,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  sq_stable: SqStable(P),  subtract: n - m,  le: A ≤ B
Lemmas referenced :  strong-subtype-implies,  list_extensionality,  length_wf,  select_wf,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  and_wf,  equal_wf,  list_wf,  length_wf_nat,  nat_wf,  less_than_wf,  subtype_rel_list,  strong-subtype_wf,  exists_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  ge_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  colength_wf_list,  less_than_transitivity1,  less_than_irreflexivity,  list-cases,  nil_wf,  product_subtype_list,  spread_cons_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  le_wf,  subtract_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  subtype_base_sq,  set_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  decidable__equal_int,  cons_wf,  hd_wf,  length_of_nil_lemma,  cons_neq_nil,  length_of_cons_lemma,  false_wf,  not-ge-2,  sq_stable__le,  condition-implies-le,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  add-swap,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-associates,  add-commutes,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  add-zero,  le-add-cancel2,  reduce_hd_cons_lemma,  squash_wf,  tl_wf,  reduce_tl_cons_lemma
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  hypothesis,  because_Cache,  independent_isectElimination,  applyEquality,  lambdaEquality,  imageElimination,  equalitySymmetry,  natural_numberEquality,  sqequalRule,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  lambdaFormation,  dependent_functionElimination,  setElimination,  rename,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  intEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  addLevel,  hyp_replacement,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  applyLambdaEquality,  productElimination,  levelHypothesis,  cumulativity,  universeEquality,  setEquality,  intWeakElimination,  axiomEquality,  promote_hyp,  hypothesis_subsumption,  addEquality,  instantiate,  minusEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[A,B:Type].    \mforall{}[L1:A  List].  \mforall{}[L2:B  List].    L1  =  L2  supposing  L1  =  L2  supposing  strong-subtype(A;B)



Date html generated: 2017_04_14-AM-09_27_31
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-04_02_23

Theory : list_1


Home Index