Nuprl Lemma : bezout_ident_n

∀b:ℕ. ∀a:ℤ.  ∃u,v:ℤ. GCD(a;b;(u * a) + (v * b))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  gcd_p: GCD(a;b;y),  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  multiply: n * m,  add: n + m,  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  ge: i ≥ j ,  less_than: a < b,  nat: ℕ,  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  le: A ≤ B,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  prop: ℙ,  top: Top,  not: ¬A,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  false: False,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  uimplies: b supposing a,  and: P ∧ Q,  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  int_seg: {i..j-},  guard: {T},  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  subtract: n - m,  true: True,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  nat_plus: ℕ+,  squash: ↓T
Lemmas referenced :  int_term_value_add_lemma,  itermAdd_wf,  nat_properties,  nat_wf,  primrec-wf2,  less_than_wf,  decidable__lt,  gcd_p_wf,  exists_wf,  all_wf,  le_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  decidable__le,  lelt_wf,  set_wf,  false_wf,  int_seg_subtype,  subtract_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  int_seg_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  int_seg_properties,  add-zero,  one-mul,  gcd_p_zero,  minus-zero,  minus-add,  add-commutes,  condition-implies-le,  le-add-cancel,  zero-add,  add-associates,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  not-equal-2,  not-lt-2,  quot_rem_exists,  istype-void,  gcd_p_sym,  gcd_p_shift,  mul-commutes,  mul-distributes,  mul-distributes-right,  minus-one-mul,  mul-swap,  mul-associates,  add-swap,  add-mul-special,  zero-mul,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  istype-int,  add_functionality_wrt_eq,  mul_com,  subtype_rel_self,  iff_weakening_equal
Rules used in proof :  multiplyEquality,  addEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  hypothesis_subsumption,  levelHypothesis,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  applyEquality,  addLevel,  unionElimination,  computeAll,  independent_pairFormation,  sqequalRule,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  independent_isectElimination,  productElimination,  rename,  setElimination,  hypothesis,  hypothesisEquality,  because_Cache,  natural_numberEquality,  isectElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  introduction,  thin,  cut,  lambdaFormation,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution,  Error :dependent_pairFormation_alt,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  Error :universeIsType,  Error :productIsType,  Error :inhabitedIsType,  minusEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  Error :isect_memberEquality_alt,  Error :lambdaEquality_alt,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  instantiate,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}b:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}a:\mBbbZ{}.    \mexists{}u,v:\mBbbZ{}.  GCD(a;b;(u  *  a)  +  (v  *  b))



Date html generated: 2019_06_20-PM-02_22_20
Last ObjectModification: 2019_01_11-AM-09_03_44

Theory : num_thy_1


Home Index