Nuprl Lemma : nh-comp-nc-m-eq

∀[I,K:fset(ℕ)]. ∀[i,j:ℕ]. ∀[f:K ⟶ I+i+j].  (i0) ⋅ s ⋅ s ⋅ f = m(i;j) ⋅ f ∈ K ⟶ I+i supposing (f i) = 0 ∈ Point(dM(K))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  nc-m: m(i;j),  nc-0: (i0),  nc-s: s,  add-name: I+i,  nh-comp: g ⋅ f,  names-hom: I ⟶ J,  dM0: 0,  dM: dM(I),  lattice-point: Point(l),  fset: fset(T),  nat: ℕ,  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  apply: f a,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  names: names(I),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  uimplies: b supposing a,  nat: ℕ,  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  prop: ℙ,  names-hom: I ⟶ J,  DeMorgan-algebra: DeMorganAlgebra,  and: P ∧ Q,  guard: {T},  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  dM0: 0,  top: Top,  compose: f o g,  nc-0: (i0),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  bfalse: ff,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  false: False,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  not: ¬A,  dma-hom: dma-hom(dma1;dma2),  bounded-lattice-hom: Hom(l1;l2),  lattice-hom: Hom(l1;l2),  nc-s: s,  nc-m: m(i;j)
Lemmas referenced :  trivial-member-add-name1,  fset-member_wf,  nat_wf,  int-deq_wf,  strong-subtype-deq-subtype,  strong-subtype-set3,  le_wf,  strong-subtype-self,  add-name_wf,  trivial-member-add-name2,  names_wf,  equal_wf,  lattice-point_wf,  dM_wf,  subtype_rel_set,  DeMorgan-algebra-structure_wf,  lattice-structure_wf,  lattice-axioms_wf,  bounded-lattice-structure-subtype,  DeMorgan-algebra-structure-subtype,  subtype_rel_transitivity,  bounded-lattice-structure_wf,  bounded-lattice-axioms_wf,  uall_wf,  lattice-meet_wf,  lattice-join_wf,  DeMorgan-algebra-axioms_wf,  dM0_wf,  names-hom_wf,  fset_wf,  decidable__equal_int,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  nh-comp_wf,  nc-s_wf,  f-subset-add-name,  nc-0_wf,  nh-comp-nc-m,  iff_weakening_equal,  lattice-meet-0,  bdd-distributive-lattice-subtype-bdd-lattice,  DeMorgan-algebra-subtype,  DeMorgan-algebra_wf,  bdd-distributive-lattice_wf,  bdd-lattice_wf,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  dM0-sq-empty,  eqff_to_assert,  bool_cases_sqequal,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  nat_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformnot_wf,  intformeq_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  nh-comp-sq,  dM-lift_wf,  dma-hom_wf,  all_wf,  dM_inc_wf,  names-subtype,  dM-lift-0,  nh-comp-cancel,  nc-m_wf,  dM-lift-inc,  not-added-name
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  cut,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  dependent_functionElimination,  thin,  hypothesis,  isectElimination,  applyEquality,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  because_Cache,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  functionExtensionality,  instantiate,  productEquality,  cumulativity,  universeEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  unionElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  independent_functionElimination,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  productElimination,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  lambdaFormation,  equalityElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  promote_hyp,  int_eqEquality,  computeAll,  setEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[I,K:fset(\mBbbN{})].  \mforall{}[i,j:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[f:K  {}\mrightarrow{}  I+i+j].    (i0)  \mcdot{}  s  \mcdot{}  s  \mcdot{}  f  =  m(i;j)  \mcdot{}  f  supposing  (f  i)  =  0



Date html generated: 2017_10_05-AM-01_03_21
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_28-AM-09_26_38

Theory : cubical!type!theory


Home Index