Nuprl Lemma : mul-polynom_wf

∀[n:ℕ]. ∀[p,q:polyform(n)].  (mul-polynom(n;p;q) ∈ polyform(n))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  mul-polynom: mul-polynom(n;p;q),  polyform: polyform(n),  nat: ℕ,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  assert: ↑b,  bnot: ¬bb,  so_apply: x[s1;s2],  so_lambda: λ2x y.t[x; y],  unit: Unit,  bool: 𝔹,  bfalse: ff,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  sq_type: SQType(T),  it: ⋅,  nil: [],  polyconst: polyconst(n;k),  guard: {T},  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  subtract: n - m,  eq_int: (i =z j),  polyform: polyform(n),  or: P ∨ Q,  decidable: Dec(P),  mul-polynom: mul-polynom(n;p;q),  prop: ℙ,  and: P ∧ Q,  top: Top,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  not: ¬A,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  uimplies: b supposing a,  ge: i ≥ j ,  false: False,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  nat: ℕ,  member: t ∈ T,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x]
Lemmas referenced :  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  assert-bnot,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_rel-equal,  assert_of_null,  map_wf,  poly-zero_wf,  polynom_subtype_polyform,  polyconst_wf,  cons_wf,  append_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  null_wf,  btrue_wf,  add-polynom_wf1,  eager-accum_wf,  equal_wf,  uiff_transitivity,  assert_of_bnot,  iff_weakening_uiff,  iff_transitivity,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  bool_subtype_base,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_cases,  valueall-type-polyform,  list-valueall-type,  list_wf,  bool_wf,  int_subtype_base,  equal-wf-base,  not_wf,  bnot_wf,  assert_wf,  eq_int_wf,  nil_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  intformeq_wf,  less_than_irreflexivity,  le_weakening,  less_than_transitivity1,  decidable__equal_int,  nat_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  itermSubtract_wf,  intformnot_wf,  subtract_wf,  decidable__le,  le_wf,  polyform_wf,  less_than_wf,  ge_wf,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  intformless_wf,  itermVar_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformand_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  nat_properties
Rules used in proof :  promote_hyp,  equalityElimination,  impliesFunctionality,  productElimination,  cumulativity,  instantiate,  closedConclusion,  baseApply,  baseClosed,  int_eqReduceFalseSq,  applyEquality,  int_eqReduceTrueSq,  because_Cache,  multiplyEquality,  unionElimination,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  axiomEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  computeAll,  independent_pairFormation,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  lambdaEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  independent_isectElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  lambdaFormation,  intWeakElimination,  sqequalRule,  rename,  setElimination,  hypothesis,  hypothesisEquality,  thin,  isectElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  extract_by_obid,  cut,  introduction,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalReflexivity,  computationStep,  sqequalTransitivity,  sqequalSubstitution

Latex:
\mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}].  \mforall{}[p,q:polyform(n)].    (mul-polynom(n;p;q)  \mmember{}  polyform(n))



Date html generated: 2017_04_20-AM-07_12_50
Last ObjectModification: 2017_04_17-PM-04_31_07

Theory : list_1


Home Index