Nuprl Lemma : nth-better-fibs

∀n:ℕ. (s-nth(n;better-fibs()) = fib(n) ∈ ℤ)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  better-fibs: better-fibs(),  fib: fib(n),  s-nth: s-nth(n;s),  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  int: ℤ,  equal: s = t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  better-fibs: better-fibs(),  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  top: Top,  has-value: (a)↓,  uimplies: b supposing a,  nat: ℕ,  ge: i ≥ j ,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  not: ¬A,  and: P ∧ Q,  prop: ℙ,  le: A ≤ B,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  so_apply: x[s],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  fib: fib(n),  eq_int: (i =z j),  subtract: n - m,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  bor: p ∨bq,  bfalse: ff,  s-nth: s-nth(n;s),  mk-stream: mk-stream(f;x),  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  squash: ↓T,  true: True,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  bnot: ¬bb,  assert: ↑b,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  pi1: fst(t),  callbyvalueall: callbyvalueall,  has-valueall: has-valueall(a)
Lemmas referenced :  nth-stream-map,  nat_wf,  mk-stream_wf,  value-type-has-value,  int-value-type,  nat_properties,  decidable__le,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  le_wf,  false_wf,  product-valueall-type,  set-valueall-type,  int-valueall-type,  stream-subtype,  top_wf,  testxxx_lemma,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  ge_wf,  less_than_wf,  eq_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  fib_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  add-zero,  add-commutes,  add-associates,  zero-add,  not-le-2,  condition-implies-le,  minus-add,  minus-one-mul,  minus-one-mul-top,  add-swap,  add_functionality_wrt_le,  le-add-cancel,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  intformeq_wf,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  subtract_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  product_subtype_base,  int_subtype_base,  set_subtype_base,  decidable__equal_int,  valueall-type-has-valueall,  evalall-reduce,  iff_weakening_equal
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  sqequalRule,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  isect_memberEquality,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  productEquality,  because_Cache,  lambdaEquality,  productElimination,  callbyvalueReduce,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  addEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  independent_pairEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  independent_functionElimination,  applyEquality,  intWeakElimination,  axiomEquality,  equalityElimination,  sqleReflexivity,  imageElimination,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  imageMemberEquality,  baseClosed,  minusEquality,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}n:\mBbbN{}.  (s-nth(n;better-fibs())  =  fib(n))



Date html generated: 2017_04_17-AM-09_49_23
Last ObjectModification: 2017_02_27-PM-05_45_45

Theory : num_thy_1


Home Index