Nuprl Lemma : r-archimedean2

∀x:ℝ. ∃N:ℕ. ∀n:{N...}. (|(x/r(n + 1))| ≤ (r1/r(2)))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  rdiv: (x/y),  rleq: x ≤ y,  rabs: |x|,  int-to-real: r(n),  real: ℝ,  int_upper: {i...},  nat: ℕ,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  add: n + m,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  rge: x ≥ y,  top: Top,  not: ¬A,  false: False,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  decidable: Dec(P),  ge: i ≥ j ,  nat: ℕ,  rev_uimplies: rev_uimplies(P;Q),  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  true: True,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  squash: ↓T,  less_than: a < b,  prop: ℙ,  implies: P ⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  or: P ∨ Q,  guard: {T},  rneq: x ≠ y,  uimplies: b supposing a,  and: P ∧ Q,  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  int_upper: {i...},  so_apply: x[s],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  rdiv: (x/y),  itermConstant: "const",  req_int_terms: t1 ≡ t2,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  btrue: tt,  bfalse: ff,  sq_type: SQType(T),  bnot: ¬bb,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  assert: ↑b
Lemmas referenced :  real_wf,  rleq_weakening_equal,  rleq_functionality_wrt_implies,  rmul_comm,  rmul-rdiv-cancel2,  req_weakening,  rleq_functionality,  uiff_transitivity,  int_formula_prop_wf,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  itermConstant_wf,  itermAdd_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformle_wf,  intformnot_wf,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  decidable__le,  nat_properties,  rleq-int,  rless_wf,  rleq_wf,  rless-int,  rdiv_wf,  rmul_preserves_rleq,  rabs_wf,  int-to-real_wf,  rmul_wf,  r-archimedean,  int_upper_wf,  all_wf,  int_upper_properties,  decidable__lt,  intformand_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  rneq_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  rabs-int,  iff_weakening_equal,  absval_pos,  le_wf,  rinv_wf2,  absval_wf,  rneq_functionality,  rabs-of-nonneg,  rabs-rdiv,  rless_functionality,  req_transitivity,  real_term_polynomial,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermMultiply_wf,  real_term_value_const_lemma,  real_term_value_sub_lemma,  real_term_value_mul_lemma,  real_term_value_var_lemma,  req-iff-rsub-is-0,  rmul-rinv3,  uiff_transitivity2,  rinv-mul-as-rdiv,  absval_unfold,  lt_int_wf,  bool_wf,  eqtt_to_assert,  assert_of_lt_int,  top_wf,  less_than_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  equal_wf,  bool_cases_sqequal,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_subtype_base,  assert-bnot
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  lambdaFormation,  cut,  introduction,  extract_by_obid,  hypothesis,  equalitySymmetry,  equalityTransitivity,  computeAll,  voidEquality,  voidElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  intEquality,  int_eqEquality,  lambdaEquality,  unionElimination,  rename,  setElimination,  addEquality,  baseClosed,  imageMemberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  independent_functionElimination,  inrFormation,  sqequalRule,  independent_isectElimination,  because_Cache,  dependent_pairFormation,  productElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  natural_numberEquality,  isectElimination,  thin,  dependent_functionElimination,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  applyEquality,  imageElimination,  universeEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  minusEquality,  equalityElimination,  lessCases,  isect_memberFormation,  sqequalAxiom,  promote_hyp,  instantiate,  cumulativity

Latex:
\mforall{}x:\mBbbR{}.  \mexists{}N:\mBbbN{}.  \mforall{}n:\{N...\}.  (|(x/r(n  +  1))|  \mleq{}  (r1/r(2)))



Date html generated: 2017_10_03-AM-09_23_03
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_28-AM-07_46_12

Theory : reals


Home Index