Nuprl Lemma : member-listify

[T:Type]. ∀m:ℤ. ∀n:{n:ℤn ≥ . ∀f:{m..n-} ⟶ T.  ∀[x:T]. ((x ∈ listify(f;m;n)) ⇐⇒ ∃i:{m..n-}. (x (f i) ∈ T))


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  l_member: (x ∈ l) listify: listify(f;m;n) int_seg: {i..j-} uall: [x:A]. B[x] ge: i ≥  all: x:A. B[x] exists: x:A. B[x] iff: ⇐⇒ Q set: {x:A| B[x]}  apply: a function: x:A ⟶ B[x] int: universe: Type equal: t ∈ T
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: [x:A]. B[x] member: t ∈ T all: x:A. B[x] int_seg: {i..j-} implies:  Q prop: so_lambda: λ2x.t[x] so_apply: x[s] nat: guard: {T} lelt: i ≤ j < k and: P ∧ Q uimplies: supposing a satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla) exists: x:A. B[x] false: False not: ¬A top: Top listify: listify(f;m;n) bool: 𝔹 unit: Unit it: btrue: tt uiff: uiff(P;Q) ifthenelse: if then else fi  iff: ⇐⇒ Q rev_implies:  Q bfalse: ff or: P ∨ Q sq_type: SQType(T) bnot: ¬bb assert: b decidable: Dec(P) subtype_rel: A ⊆B ge: i ≥  sq_stable: SqStable(P) squash: T l_member: (x ∈ l) cand: c∧ B le: A ≤ B true: True
Lemmas referenced :  int_seg_wf all_wf subtract_wf iff_wf l_member_wf listify_wf exists_wf equal_wf set_wf less_than_wf primrec-wf2 nat_wf int_seg_properties satisfiable-full-omega-tt intformand_wf intformless_wf itermVar_wf itermAdd_wf itermConstant_wf intformle_wf int_formula_prop_and_lemma int_formula_prop_less_lemma int_term_value_var_lemma int_term_value_add_lemma int_term_value_constant_lemma int_formula_prop_le_lemma int_formula_prop_wf le_int_wf bool_wf eqtt_to_assert assert_of_le_int null_nil_lemma btrue_wf member-implies-null-eq-bfalse nil_wf btrue_neq_bfalse eqff_to_assert bool_cases_sqequal subtype_base_sq bool_subtype_base assert-bnot le_wf cons_wf decidable__le intformnot_wf int_formula_prop_not_lemma decidable__lt lelt_wf subtype_rel_dep_function int_seg_subtype cons_member itermSubtract_wf int_term_value_subtract_lemma or_wf decidable__equal_int int_subtype_base intformeq_wf int_formula_prop_eq_lemma ge_wf sq_stable__le select_member length_wf squash_wf true_wf list_wf iff_weakening_equal
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution sqequalTransitivity computationStep sqequalReflexivity isect_memberFormation cut universeEquality lambdaFormation thin hypothesisEquality functionEquality introduction extract_by_obid sqequalHypSubstitution isectElimination setElimination rename hypothesis cumulativity addEquality natural_numberEquality intEquality because_Cache sqequalRule lambdaEquality functionExtensionality applyEquality productElimination independent_isectElimination dependent_pairFormation int_eqEquality dependent_functionElimination isect_memberEquality voidElimination voidEquality independent_pairFormation computeAll unionElimination equalityElimination equalityTransitivity equalitySymmetry independent_functionElimination promote_hyp instantiate dependent_set_memberEquality addLevel orFunctionality levelHypothesis inlFormation inrFormation imageMemberEquality baseClosed imageElimination

Latex:
\mforall{}[T:Type]
    \mforall{}m:\mBbbZ{}.  \mforall{}n:\{n:\mBbbZ{}|  n  \mgeq{}  m  \}  .  \mforall{}f:\{m..n\msupminus{}\}  {}\mrightarrow{}  T.
        \mforall{}[x:T].  ((x  \mmember{}  listify(f;m;n))  \mLeftarrow{}{}\mRightarrow{}  \mexists{}i:\{m..n\msupminus{}\}.  (x  =  (f  i)))



Date html generated: 2018_05_21-PM-06_53_29
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-04_58_58

Theory : general


Home Index