Nuprl Lemma : summand-qle-sum

∀[a,b:ℤ]. ∀[E:{a..b-} ⟶ ℚ].  ∀[i:{a..b-}]. (E[i] ≤ Σa ≤ j < b. E[j]) supposing ∀j:{a..b-}. (0 ≤ E[j])


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  qsum: Σa ≤ j < b. E[j],  qle: r ≤ s,  rationals: ℚ,  int_seg: {i..j-},  uimplies: b supposing a,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  so_apply: x[s],  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  function: x:A ⟶ B[x],  natural_number: $n,  int: ℤ
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  uimplies: b supposing a,  int_seg: {i..j-},  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  implies: P ⇒ Q,  prop: ℙ,  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  and: P ∧ Q,  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  lelt: i ≤ j < k,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  not: ¬A,  top: Top,  or: P ∨ Q,  sq_type: SQType(T),  guard: {T},  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  iff: P ⇐⇒ Q,  rev_implies: P ⇐ Q,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  btrue: tt,  bfalse: ff,  delta: delta(i;j),  true: True,  bool: 𝔹,  unit: Unit,  it: ⋅,  squash: ↓T
Lemmas referenced :  qsum-delta,  qle_witness,  int_seg_wf,  qsum_wf,  all_wf,  qle_wf,  int-subtype-rationals,  rationals_wf,  band_wf,  le_int_wf,  lt_int_wf,  assert_wf,  le_wf,  less_than_wf,  qsum-qle,  qmul_wf,  delta_wf,  subtype_rel_set,  lelt_wf,  bnot_wf,  not_wf,  int_seg_properties,  satisfiable-full-omega-tt,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformle_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformless_wf,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  bool_cases,  subtype_base_sq,  bool_wf,  bool_subtype_base,  eqtt_to_assert,  iff_transitivity,  iff_weakening_uiff,  assert_of_band,  assert_of_le_int,  assert_of_lt_int,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_bnot,  eq_int_wf,  equal-wf-T-base,  int_subtype_base,  qle_reflexivity,  uiff_transitivity,  assert_of_eq_int,  equal_wf,  squash_wf,  true_wf,  qmul_one_qrng,  iff_weakening_equal,  qmul_zero_qrng
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation,  introduction,  cut,  extract_by_obid,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  isectElimination,  thin,  hypothesisEquality,  setElimination,  rename,  hypothesis,  applyEquality,  functionExtensionality,  sqequalRule,  lambdaEquality,  independent_functionElimination,  isect_memberEquality,  because_Cache,  natural_numberEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  functionEquality,  intEquality,  productEquality,  productElimination,  independent_isectElimination,  lambdaFormation,  hyp_replacement,  applyLambdaEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  int_eqEquality,  dependent_functionElimination,  voidElimination,  voidEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  computeAll,  unionElimination,  instantiate,  cumulativity,  impliesFunctionality,  baseClosed,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  equalityElimination,  imageElimination,  imageMemberEquality,  universeEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[a,b:\mBbbZ{}].  \mforall{}[E:\{a..b\msupminus{}\}  {}\mrightarrow{}  \mBbbQ{}].
    \mforall{}[i:\{a..b\msupminus{}\}].  (E[i]  \mleq{}  \mSigma{}a  \mleq{}  j  <  b.  E[j])  supposing  \mforall{}j:\{a..b\msupminus{}\}.  (0  \mleq{}  E[j])



Date html generated: 2018_05_22-AM-00_00_05
Last ObjectModification: 2017_07_26-PM-06_49_08

Theory : rationals


Home Index