Nuprl Lemma : p-digit_wf

∀[p:ℕ+]. ∀[a:p-adics(p)]. ∀[n:ℕ+].  (p-digit(p;a;n) ∈ ℕp)


Proof




Definitions occuring in Statement :  p-digit: p-digit(p;a;n),  p-adics: p-adics(p),  int_seg: {i..j-},  nat_plus: ℕ+,  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  natural_number: $n
Definitions unfolded in proof :  uall: ∀[x:A]. B[x],  member: t ∈ T,  p-adics: p-adics(p),  all: ∀x:A. B[x],  nat_plus: ℕ+,  decidable: Dec(P),  or: P ∨ Q,  uimplies: b supposing a,  sq_type: SQType(T),  implies: P ⇒ Q,  guard: {T},  so_apply: x[s],  so_lambda: λ2x.t[x],  subtype_rel: A ⊆r B,  prop: ℙ,  and: P ∧ Q,  true: True,  less_than': less_than'(a;b),  squash: ↓T,  less_than: a < b,  btrue: tt,  ifthenelse: if b then t else f fi ,  subtract: n - m,  eq_int: (i =z j),  p-digit: p-digit(p;a;n),  not: ¬A,  satisfiable_int_formula: satisfiable_int_formula(fmla),  exists: ∃x:A. B[x],  false: False,  eqmod: a ≡ b mod m,  divides: b | a,  assert: ↑b,  bnot: ¬bb,  bfalse: ff,  top: Top,  uiff: uiff(P;Q),  it: ⋅,  unit: Unit,  bool: 𝔹,  nat: ℕ,  nequal: a ≠ b ∈ T ,  int_nzero: ℤ-o,  int_seg: {i..j-},  lelt: i ≤ j < k
Lemmas referenced :  decidable__equal_int,  subtype_base_sq,  int_subtype_base,  p-adics_wf,  nat_plus_wf,  int_seg_wf,  subtype_rel_self,  exp1,  exp-positive,  set_subtype_base,  less_than_wf,  subtract_wf,  nat_plus_properties,  decidable__lt,  full-omega-unsat,  intformand_wf,  intformnot_wf,  intformless_wf,  itermConstant_wf,  itermSubtract_wf,  itermVar_wf,  intformeq_wf,  istype-int,  int_formula_prop_and_lemma,  int_formula_prop_not_lemma,  int_formula_prop_less_lemma,  int_term_value_constant_lemma,  int_term_value_subtract_lemma,  int_term_value_var_lemma,  int_formula_prop_eq_lemma,  int_formula_prop_wf,  istype-less_than,  subtract-add-cancel,  neg_assert_of_eq_int,  assert-bnot,  bool_subtype_base,  bool_cases_sqequal,  equal_wf,  eqff_to_assert,  assert_of_eq_int,  eqtt_to_assert,  bool_wf,  eq_int_wf,  le_wf,  int_formula_prop_le_lemma,  intformle_wf,  decidable__le,  exp-fastexp,  equal-wf-base,  nequal_wf,  subtype_rel_sets,  exp_wf3,  div-cancel2,  p-adic-bounds,  eqmod_wf,  exp_wf2,  istype-le,  itermAdd_wf,  int_term_value_add_lemma,  false_wf,  int_term_value_mul_lemma,  itermMultiply_wf,  multiply-is-int-iff,  exp_wf_nat_plus,  mul_cancel_in_le,  mul_cancel_in_lt,  mul-commutes,  exp_step,  int_seg_properties
Rules used in proof :  sqequalSubstitution,  sqequalTransitivity,  computationStep,  sqequalReflexivity,  isect_memberFormation_alt,  introduction,  cut,  sqequalHypSubstitution,  setElimination,  thin,  rename,  extract_by_obid,  dependent_functionElimination,  hypothesisEquality,  hypothesis,  natural_numberEquality,  unionElimination,  instantiate,  isectElimination,  cumulativity,  intEquality,  independent_isectElimination,  because_Cache,  independent_functionElimination,  sqequalRule,  axiomEquality,  equalityTransitivity,  equalitySymmetry,  inhabitedIsType,  isect_memberEquality_alt,  isectIsTypeImplies,  universeIsType,  lambdaEquality,  baseClosed,  imageMemberEquality,  independent_pairFormation,  dependent_set_memberEquality,  applyEquality,  dependent_set_memberEquality_alt,  approximateComputation,  dependent_pairFormation_alt,  lambdaEquality_alt,  int_eqEquality,  Error :memTop,  voidElimination,  productElimination,  promote_hyp,  voidEquality,  isect_memberEquality,  dependent_pairFormation,  equalityElimination,  lambdaFormation,  setEquality,  functionIsType,  addEquality,  productIsType,  closedConclusion,  baseApply,  pointwiseFunctionality,  multiplyEquality,  applyLambdaEquality

Latex:
\mforall{}[p:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}].  \mforall{}[a:p-adics(p)].  \mforall{}[n:\mBbbN{}\msupplus{}].    (p-digit(p;a;n)  \mmember{}  \mBbbN{}p)



Date html generated: 2020_05_19-PM-10_08_18
Last ObjectModification: 2020_01_08-PM-06_00_08

Theory : rings_1


Home Index